Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Visualization, Quantification, and Mapping of Immune Cell Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: March 25, 2020
Site-Specific Cancer Incidence by Race and Immigration Status in Canada 2006-2015: A Population-Based Data Linkage
Talía Malagón1, Samantha Morais1, Parker Tope1
1Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Background:
The Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR) does not collect demographic data beyond age and sex, making it difficult to monitor health inequalities. Using data linkage, we compared site-specific cancer incidence rates by race.
Methods:
The 2006 and 2011 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts are population-based probabilistically linked datasets of 5.9 million respondents of the 2006 long-form census and 6.5 million respondents of the 2011 National Household Survey. Race was self-reported. Respondent data were linked with the CCR up to 2015. We calculated age-standardized incidence rate ratios (ASIRR), comparing group-specific rates to the overall population rate with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used negative binomial regressions to adjust for socioeconomic variables and assess interactions with immigration status.
Results:
The age-standardized overall cancer incidence rate was lower in almost all non-White racial groups than in the overall population, except for White and Indigenous peoples who had higher incidence rates than the overall population (ASIRRs, 1.03-1.04). Immigrants had substantially lower age-standardized overall cancer incidence rates than nonimmigrants (ASIRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.82-0.84). Stomach, liver, and thyroid cancers and multiple myelomas were the sites where non-White racial groups had consistently higher site-specific cancer incidence rates than the overall population. Immigration status was an important modifier of cancer risk in the interaction model.
Conclusions:
Differences in cancer incidence between racial groups are likely influenced by differences in lifestyles, early life exposures, and selection factors for immigration.
Impact:
Data linkage can help monitor health inequalities and assess progress in preventive interventions against cancer. See related commentary by Withrow and Gomez, p. 876.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
09:23Three-Dimensional Culture Assay to Explore Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Satellite Tumor Formation
Published on: August 18, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Prevention
Some...