Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Long-Term Mortality and Amputation Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Peripheral
Kim G Smolderen1, Gaëlle Romain2, Jeremy B Provance2
1Vascular Medicine Outcomes Program, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Psychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Background:
Lack of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) may increase mortality and amputation risk.
Objectives:
The authors sought to study the association between GDMT and mortality/amputation and to examine GDMT variability among providers and health systems.
Methods:
We performed an observational study using patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry undergoing PVI between 2017 and 2018. Two-year all-cause mortality and major amputation data were derived from Medicare claims data. Compliance with GDMT was defined as receiving a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker if hypertensive. Propensity 1:1 matching was applied for GDMT vs no GDMT and survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups.
Results:
Of 15,891 patients undergoing PVIs, 48.8% received GDMT and 6,120 patients in each group were matched. Median follow-up was 9.6 (IQR: 4.5-16.2) months for mortality and 8.4 (IQR: 3.5-15.4) for amputation. Mean age was 72.0 ± 9.9 years. Mortality risk was higher among patients who did not receive GDMT versus those on GDMT (31.2% vs 24.5%; HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25-1.50; P < 0.001), as well as, risk of amputation (16.0% vs 13.2%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.35; P < 0.001). GDMT rates across sites and providers ranging from 0% to 100%, with lower performance translating into higher risk.
Conclusions:
Almost one-half of the patients receiving PVI in this national quality registry were not on GDMT, and this was associated with increased risk of mortality and major amputation. Quality improvement efforts in vascular care should focus on GDMT in patients undergoing PVI.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
14:52Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care