Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

980
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
980
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local Spin Density Approximation Strongly Improved by a Better-Informed Local Scaling of Its Self-Interaction Correction.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Atom-specific vibrational analysis reveals labile bonds in linear and branched PFOA molecules.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Noniterative Fermi-Löwdin Orbitals for Self-Interaction Correction.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same author

Hartree-Fock density functional theory works through error cancellation for the interaction energies of halogen and chalcogen bonded complexes.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

The electron localization function and the chemical interpretation of Fermi orbital descriptors in Fermi-Löwdin self-interaction correction calculations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Atomic ionization: sd energy imbalance and Perdew-Zunger self-interaction correction energy penalty in 3d atoms.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

The influence of chirality on the macroscopic behavior of multiferroic smectic phases.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Polaron transformed canonically consistent quantum master equation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

The x-ray absorption spectrum of the propargyl radical C3H3●.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Transient hydroperoxyalkyl intermediates (•QOOH) in isopentane oxidation. I. Conformer- and isomer-resolved infrared spectra.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Transient hydroperoxyalkyl intermediates (•QOOH) in isopentane oxidation. II. Isomer-resolved unimolecular dynamics.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantum state-to-state dynamics studies of the C(3P) + OH(X2Π) → CO(a3Π) + H(2S) reaction based on a new HCO(12A″) potential energy surface.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement for Detecting and Characterizing Self-Associations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
07:24

Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement for Detecting and Characterizing Self-Associations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Published on: September 23, 2021

1.8K

Spin-crossover complexes: Self-interaction correction vs density correction.

Shiqi Ruan1, Koblar A Jackson2, Adrienn Ruzsinszky1

  • 1Department of Physics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|February 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurately calculating spin-crossover energies in transition metal complexes is challenging. Using self-interaction corrected densities improves the accuracy of these energy calculations for high-spin and low-spin states.

More Related Videos

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement for Detecting and Characterizing Self-Associations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
07:24

Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement for Detecting and Characterizing Self-Associations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Published on: September 23, 2021

1.8K
Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Transition metal complexes with 3d4-3d7 electron configurations exhibit high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states.
  • The spin-crossover energy, the difference between HS and LS states, is small and difficult to calculate accurately.
  • Accurate calculation of spin-crossover energies is crucial for understanding and designing materials with tunable magnetic properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of various electronic structure approximations for calculating spin-crossover energies.
  • To investigate the impact of self-interaction correction on the accuracy of spin-crossover energy calculations.
  • To identify methods that can reliably predict spin-crossover energies in iron complexes.

Main Methods:

  • Calculations of spin-crossover energies for iron complexes using methods based on the random phase approximation (RPA) and Fermi-Löwdin self-interaction correction (FL-SIC).
  • Comparison of self-consistent and post-self-consistent calculation results.
  • Analysis of Hartree-Fock (HF) densities and their resemblance to Perdew-Zunger-type self-interaction corrected (PZ-SIC) densities.

Main Results:

  • Evaluating exchange-correlation energy functionals on self-interaction-corrected densities mitigates density errors.
  • This approach improves the accuracy of adiabatic energy differences between high-spin and low-spin states.
  • The study highlights the importance of density accuracy for reliable spin-crossover energy predictions.

Conclusions:

  • Self-interaction corrected densities offer a promising route to improve the accuracy of spin-crossover energy calculations.
  • The findings provide guidance for selecting appropriate electronic structure methods for studying spin-crossover phenomena.
  • Accurate theoretical predictions of spin-crossover energies are essential for advancing molecular magnetism and materials science.