Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Photoelectron Imaging of Anions Illustrated by 310 Nm Detachment of F−
Published on: July 27, 2018
The core ionization energies calculated by delta SCF and Slater's transition state theory
Kimihiko Hirao1, Takahito Nakajima2, Bun Chan3
1Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry, Kyoto University, Takano, Nishihiraki-cho 34-4, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8103, Japan.
Abstract:
The core ionization energies of the second-period and third-period elements are studied by ΔSCF and Slater's transition state (STS) theory by using Hartree-Fock (HF) and Kohn-Sham (KS) approximations. Electron correlation increases the estimated core ionization energies, while the self-interaction error (SIE) decreases them, especially for the third-period elements and is a more significant factor. As a result, while HF lacks electron correlation, it is free of SIE and reasonably predicts the core ionization energies. The core ionization energies calculated by HF STS are very close to those calculated by HF ΔSCF, showing that STS reasonably describes the relaxation of the core hole. The core ionization energies calculated by KS are particularly sensitive to the SIE of the functional used, with functionals having less SIE yielding more accurate ΔSCF core ionization energies. Consequently, BH&HLYP gives better results than B3LYP and LC-BOP since BH&HLYP is the hybrid functional with high proportion of the exact HF exchange. Although the core ionization energies are underestimated by ΔSCF due to SIE, STS gives larger core ionization energies than ΔSCF due to a concave behavior of the error curves of STS, which is also related to SIE. The mean absolute deviations of STS relative to ΔSCF, and relative to the experiment, are almost constant regardless of the nuclei among the element in the second period, and likewise among those in the third period. The systematic nature suggests that shifting the STS core ionization energies may be useful. We propose the shifted STS (1) for reproducing ΔSCF values, and the shifted STS (2) to reproduce the observed ones for KS calculations. Both schemes work quite well. The calculated results of KS ΔSCF and STS vary depending on the functional. However, the variation of each species' shifted STS (2) is very small, and all shifted STS (2) values are close to the observed ones. As the shifted STS require only one SCF calculation, they are simple and practical for predicting the core ionization energies.
More Related Videos
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ionization Energy
The Born-Haber Cycle
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
The Energies of Atomic Orbitals
Energy Diagrams, Transition States, and Intermediates
Chemical Ionization (CI) Mass Spectrometry