Vascularised versus non-vascularised bone graft for scaphoid nonunion: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Yuki Fujihara1, Michiro Yamamoto2, Satoki Hidaka1
1Department of Orthopaedic and Hand Surgery, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital.
Background:
Numerous studies have investigated surgical techniques for vascularised bone graft (VBG) for scaphoid nonunion; however, their efficacies remain unclear. Thus, to estimate the union rate of VBG for scaphoid nonunion, we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search formula was as follows: ((scaphoid nonunion) OR (scaphoid pseudarthrosis)) AND (bone graft). Only RCTs were used in the primary analysis, and comparative studies, including RCTs, in the secondary analysis. The primary outcome was nonunion rate. We compared the outcome between VBG and non-vascularised bone graft (NVBG), pedicled VBG and NVBG, and free VBG and NVBG.
Results:
This study included a total of 4 RCTs (263 patients) and 12 observational studies (1411 patients). In the meta-analyses of both RCTs only and RCTs and other comparative studies, no significant difference in nonunion rate was found between VBG and NVBG (summary odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.52 and summary OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.12), respectively. The nonunion rates of pedicled VBG, free VBG, and NVBG were 15.0%, 10.2%, and 17.8%, respectively, and no significant difference was found.
Conclusions:
Our results indicated that the postoperative union rate in NVBG is similar to that in VBG; thus, NVBG could be the first choice of treatment for scaphoid nonunion.
