Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
Published on: July 7, 2023
(Why) Is Misinformation a Problem?
Zoë Adams1, Magda Osman2,3,4, Christos Bechlivanidis5
1Department of Linguistics, School of Languages, Linguistics and Film, Queen Mary University London.
Misinformation research often overlooks its core problems. This study questions the direct causal link between misinformation and misbehavior, and challenges technological determinism in its spread.
Area of Science:
- Interdisciplinary studies of misinformation
- Information science and technology impacts
- Political science and liberal democracy
Background:
- Proliferation of research on misinformation in the last decade.
- Limited attention to the fundamental reasons why misinformation is a problem.
- Need to examine causes and effects of misinformation across various disciplines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically analyze the causes and effects of misinformation.
- To investigate the role of information technology in misinformation proliferation.
- To assess the impact of misinformation on liberal democracy norms.
Main Methods:
- Cross-disciplinary examination of misinformation research (computer science, economics, history, information science, journalism, law, media, politics, philosophy, psychology, sociology).
- Critical analysis of the link between misinformation and observed effects.
- Evaluation of the role of information technology advancements.
- Historical epistemology perspective on intersubjectivity and truth.
Main Results:
- The consensus view implicates information technology (Internet, social media) as a primary cause of misinformation.
- Empirical evidence directly linking misinformation to specific misbehaviors remains unreliable; correlation may be mistaken for causation.
- Technological advancements enable and reveal deviations from ground truths via new forms of intersubjectivity, which historical epistemology suggests is illusory.
Conclusions:
- Doubts raised about the direct causality of effects and the nature of technological causes necessitate a re-evaluation of misinformation.
- The study considers the costs to liberal democracy norms stemming from efforts to combat misinformation.
- A nuanced understanding of misinformation's causes and effects is crucial for addressing its societal impact.
More Related Videos
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Errors in Global Positioning System
Random and Systematic Errors