Loss framing effect on reducing excessive red and processed meat consumption: Evidence from Italy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Gerarda Caso1, Giuseppina Rizzo2, Giuseppina Migliore2
1Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 96, Portici, Naples 80055, Italy.
Abstract:
A reduction of meat consumption is crucial for addressing public health problems, especially in industrialized countries. Among low-cost interventions, emotionally provocative health-information strategies could be effective options in fostering meat reduction. Through an online experimental survey, administrated to a quota-based national sample (N = 1142), this study analysed the profile of Italians consuming red/processed meat above World Health Organization (WHO) recommended amounts. Via a between-subjects design, the research tested whether two health frame-nudges (societal impact and individual impact of over consumption) persuaded these individuals to reduce future meat consumption. Results showed that adhering to an omnivore diet, higher consumption of meat than peers, household size (larger) and positive moral perception of meat consumption increased the likelihood of overconsumption. In addition, both nudges proved to be effective in positively impacting future intentions to reduce meat consumption among individuals exceeding WHO recommended amounts. The two frame-nudges were more effective among females, respondents with children in the household and individuals with a low health status perception.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
09:30Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat
Published on: April 26, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Regulation of Food Intake
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Confirmation Biases
Optimal Foraging