Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.8K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.8K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.2K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.2K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.2K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.2K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.8K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.8K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.2K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hallucination, monofacts, and miscalibration: An empirical investigation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

AI model disgorgement: Methods and choices.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Increasing COVID-19 Immunization Rates through a Vaccination Program for Hospitalized Children.

Pediatric quality & safety·2023
Same author

Response to comment on "Policy impacts of statistical uncertainty and privacy".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Reply to Sanchéz et al.: Multiplicity does not protect privacy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Policy impacts of statistical uncertainty and privacy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same journal

In This Issue.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Long-term cultural continuity across the Neanderthal-modern human sequence at Üçağızlı II Cave, northern Levant.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Dolphins use names to remember whom to avoid.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Retraction for Shaked and Frenkel, Curiouser and curiouser: Meningeal lymphoid structures in the aging brain.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Small but mighty: The outsized role of small water bodies in the global carbon cycle.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Functional traits produce conditional outcomes in different community contexts.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Confidence-ranked reconstruction of census microdata from published statistics.

Travis Dick1, Cynthia Dwork2, Michael Kearns1

  • 1Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|February 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New data reconstruction attacks can identify individuals from aggregate statistics, posing risks like identity theft. These attacks exploit query data, not just general distributions, highlighting the need for privacy techniques.

Keywords:
U.S. Censusdata privacydifferential privacyreconstruction attack

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Data Privacy
  • Applied Mathematics

Background:

  • Reconstruction attacks aim to identify private data elements from public information.
  • Aggregate query statistics can potentially leak sensitive information about underlying datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel class of data reconstruction attacks using randomized nonconvex optimization.
  • To demonstrate the effectiveness of these attacks in reconstructing individual records from aggregate statistics.
  • To assess the risks associated with releasing precise aggregate data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed reconstruction attacks based on randomized methods for nonconvex optimization.
  • Empirically evaluated attack performance on aggregate query statistics (Q(D)).
  • Compared attack efficacy against baselines using public distribution information.

Main Results:

  • Attacks successfully reconstructed full rows from aggregate query statistics.
  • Reconstructed rows were reliably ranked by their probability of inclusion in the private dataset.
  • Attacks significantly outperformed methods relying solely on public distribution data, confirming exploitation of aggregate statistics.

Conclusions:

  • Numerically precise aggregate statistics pose significant risks for data reconstruction and potential misuse.
  • Aggregate query statistics, not just population distributions, enable reconstruction of dataset elements.
  • Findings underscore the critical need for robust privacy-preserving techniques like differential privacy.