Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Identification of activity cliffs in structure-activity landscape of androgen receptor binding chemicals
R P Vivek-Ananth1, Ajaya Kumar Sahoo1, Shanmuga Priya Baskaran1
1The Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai 600113, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400094, India.
Abstract:
Androgen mimicking environmental chemicals can bind to Androgen receptor (AR) and can cause severe effects on the reproductive health of males. Predicting such endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in the human exposome is vital for improving current chemical regulations. To this end, QSAR models have been developed to predict androgen binders. However, a continuous structure-activity relationship (SAR) wherein chemicals with similar structure have similar activity does not always hold. Activity landscape analysis can help map the structure-activity landscape and identify unique features such as activity cliffs. Here we performed a systematic investigation of the chemical diversity along with the global and local structure-activity landscape of a curated list of 144 AR binding chemicals. Specifically, we clustered the AR binding chemicals and visualized the associated chemical space. Thereafter, consensus diversity plot was used to assess the global diversity of the chemical space. Subsequently, the structure-activity landscape was investigated using SAS maps which capture the activity difference and structural similarity among the AR binders. This analysis led to a subset of 41 AR binding chemicals forming 86 activity cliffs, of which 14 are activity cliff generators. Additionally, SALI scores were computed for all pairs of AR binding chemicals and the SALI heatmap was also used to evaluate the activity cliffs identified using SAS map. Finally, we provide a classification of the 86 activity cliffs into six categories using structural information of chemicals at different levels. Overall, this investigation reveals the heterogeneous nature of the structure-activity landscape of AR binding chemicals and provides insights which will be crucial in preventing false prediction of chemicals as androgen binders and developing predictive computational toxicity models in the future.
More Related Videos
09:07Detecting the Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization Activity of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using the Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay
Published on: December 19, 2018
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
The direct-acting...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...