Related Experiment Videos
The effect of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal CS-3000 on donor platelet counts
R I Kalish1, L A Chambers, J V Linden
1American Red Cross Blood Services, Connecticut Region, Farmington.
To evaluate the risk of significant plateletpheresis-induced thrombocytopenia in normal volunteer donors undergoing plateletpheresis less frequently than every 56 days and to help understand factors influencing platelet yield in these donors, pre- and postapheresis platelet counts (X 10(3)/microliter) and platelet yields were analyzed from 916 plateletpheresis procedures (Fenwal CS-3000) on 607 donors (405 men, 202 women). The mean preapheresis platelet count was 265 +/- 59 (SD) (range 155-650) (men 256 +/- 55 [170-444]; women 284 +/- 65 [155-650]; P less than .001, t-test). After an average platelet yield of 4.08 X 10(11), the mean postplatelet count was 185 +/- 46 (range 72-420) (men 184 +/- 42 [80-345]; women 194 +/- 52 [72-500]; P less than 0.1). The percent decrease in platelet count (mean 29.4 +/- 13, range -28.1-65.5) had positive correlations with platelet yield (P less than .01, r = 0.10), predonation platelet count (P less than .001, r = 0.29), and age (P less than .01, r = .10) and a negative correlation with weight (P less than .001, r = 0.18) Both the percent decrease and platelet yield were significantly higher in women than in men (P less than .001, t-test), and platelet yield was best predicted by preapheresis platelet count in both sexes (r = 0.65). The effects of plateletpheresis on donor platelet count thus vary widely among donors. Although a decrease of greater than 50% was not a rare event (5.9% of all procedures), in only three instances (0.3%) was the actual postapheresis platelet count below 100 (72, 94, 95). Thus, plateletpheresis in normal donors appears unlikely to produce clinically significant thrombocytopenia immediately after apheresis.
To evaluate the risk of significant plateletpheresis-induced thrombocytopenia in normal volunteer donors undergoing plateletpheresis less frequently than every 56 days and to help understand factors influencing platelet yield in these donors, pre- and postapheresis platelet counts (X 10(3)/microliter) and platelet yields were analyzed from 916 plateletpheresis procedures (Fenwal CS-3000) on 607 donors (405 men, 202 women). The mean preapheresis platelet count was 265 +/- 59 (SD) (range 155-650) (men 256 +/- 55 [170-444]; women 284 +/- 65 [155-650]; P less than .001, t-test). After an average platelet yield of 4.08 X 10(11), the mean postplatelet count was 185 +/- 46 (range 72-420) (men 184 +/- 42 [80-345]; women 194 +/- 52 [72-500]; P less than 0.1). The percent decrease in platelet count (mean 29.4 +/- 13, range -28.1-65.5) had positive correlations with platelet yield (P less than .01, r = 0.10), predonation platelet count (P less than .001, r = 0.29), and age (P less than .01, r = .10) and a negative correlation with weight (P less than .001, r = 0.18) Both the percent decrease and platelet yield were significantly higher in women than in men (P less than .001, t-test), and platelet yield was best predicted by preapheresis platelet count in both sexes (r = 0.65). The effects of plateletpheresis on donor platelet count thus vary widely among donors. Although a decrease of greater than 50% was not a rare event (5.9% of all procedures), in only three instances (0.3%) was the actual postapheresis platelet count below 100 (72, 94, 95). Thus, plateletpheresis in normal donors appears unlikely to produce clinically significant thrombocytopenia immediately after apheresis.