Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
In-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after carotid and vertebrobasilar artery stenting
Jae-Chan Ryu1, Jae-Han Bae1, Sang Hee Ha2
1Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) showed higher rates of stented-territory infarction compared to carotid artery stenting (CAS). In-stent restenosis was linked to infarction in CAS, but not VBS, suggesting different underlying mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Prognosis following vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) may differ from carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- Direct comparison of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction incidence and predictors between VBS and CAS is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly compare the incidence and predictors of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after VBS versus CAS.
- To elucidate potential differences in the mechanisms of stented-territory infarction between VBS and CAS.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study enrolled patients undergoing VBS or CAS.
- Follow-up for 3 years investigated in-stent restenosis (>50% lumen diameter reduction) and stented-territory infarction.
- Clinical and procedural factors were analyzed to identify predictors for both outcomes in each group.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in in-stent restenosis rates between VBS (12.9%) and CAS (6.8%).
- Stented-territory infarction was significantly more frequent after VBS (22.6%) than CAS (10.8%), particularly within a month post-procedure.
- Predictors for in-stent restenosis included HbA1c, clopidogrel resistance, and multiple stents (VBS); young age (CAS). Diabetes and multiple stents predicted infarction in VBS, while in-stent restenosis predicted infarction in CAS.
Conclusions:
- Stented-territory infarction occurs more frequently after VBS, especially in the periprocedural period.
- In-stent restenosis is a predictor of stented-territory infarction after CAS, but not VBS.
- The mechanisms driving stented-territory infarction appear distinct between VBS and CAS.
Background:
Prognosis after vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) may differ from that after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Here, we directly compared the incidence and predictors of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after VBS and compared them with those of CAS.
Methods:
We enrolled patients who underwent VBS or CAS. Clinical variables and procedure-related factors were obtained. During the 3 years of follow-up, in-stent restenosis and infarction were investigated in each group. In-stent restenosis was defined as reduction in the lumen diameter > 50% compared with that after stenting. Factors associated with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction in VBS and CAS were compared.
Results:
Among 417 stent insertions (93 VBS and 324 CAS), there was no statistical difference in in-stent restenosis between VBS and CAS (12.9% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.092). However, stented-territory infarction was more frequently observed in VBS than in CAS (22.6% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.006), especially a month after stent insertion. HbA1c level, clopidogrel resistance, and multiple stents in VBS and young age in CAS increased the risk of in-stent restenosis. Diabetes (3.82 [1.24-11.7]) and multiple stents (22.4 [2.4-206.4]) were associated with stented-territory infarction in VBS. However, in-stent restenosis (odds ratio: 15.1, 95% confidence interval: 3.17-72.2) was associated with stented-territory infarction in CAS.
Conclusions:
Stented-territory infarction occurred more frequently in VBS, especially after the periprocedural period. In-stent restenosis was associated with stented-territory infarction after CAS, but not in VBS. The mechanism of stented-territory infarction after VBS may be different from that after CAS.
Related Concept Videos
Angina II: Classification
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

