Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Impact of Endothelial Dysfunction on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Treated
Luca Paolucci1, Fabio Mangiacapra1, Michele Mattia Viscusi1
1Unit of Cardiovascular Science, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Endothelial dysfunction (ED) does not increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Long-term follow-up shows no significant association between ED and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a condition affecting blood vessel function.
- Its impact on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) remains understudied.
- This study addresses this gap by investigating the relationship between ED and adverse cardiovascular events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with and without endothelial dysfunction (ED) treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- To determine if ED is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or other adverse outcomes after PCI.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study included 109 patients undergoing PCI with second-generation DES for stable CAD.
- Endothelial dysfunction (ED) was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, with ED defined as FMD < 7%.
- Five-year follow-up data were collected to evaluate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause death.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in median FMD was observed between patients who experienced adverse outcomes and those who did not.
- There was no statistically significant association between ED and an increased risk of MACE, TVR, MI, or all-cause death at five-year follow-up.
- These findings were consistent across different definitions of ED and at one-year landmark analyses.
Conclusions:
- Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is not associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI with second-generation DES.
- The study suggests that ED may not be a significant prognostic factor in this specific patient population.
- Long-term follow-up confirms the lack of association between ED and adverse outcomes in contemporary PCI practice.
Background:
Studies investigating clinical outcomes of patients with or without endothelial disfunction (ED) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) using second generation drug eluting stents (DES) are lacking.
Methods:
We prospectively collected data from 109 patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES due to stable CAD between December 2014 and September 2016. ED was evaluated evaluating the flow mediated dilation (FMD) at the brachial artery level and defined by an FMD < 7 %. Primary outcome were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), secondary outcomes were target vessel failure (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death.
Results:
Five-year follow-up was available in all patients. Median FMD didn't significantly differ between patients who experienced the outcome and those who didn't [no TVR vs. TVR: p = 0.358; no MI vs. MI: p = 0.157; no death vs. death: p = 0.355; no MACE vs. MACE: p = 0.805]. No association between ED and an increased risk for the primary outcome as well as for the secondary ones was evident [MACE: 17.0 % vs. 14.3 %, HR 0.87 (0.33-2.26), log rank p = 0.780; TVR: 9.4 % vs. 5.4 %, HR 0.53 (0.12-2.24), log rank p = 0.384; MI: 3.7 % vs. 8.9 %, HR 2.46 (0.47-12.76), log rank p = 0.265; death: 7.5 % vs. 3.6 %, HR 0.53 (0.09-2.90), log rank p = 0.458]. These findings were confirmed using a lower threshold of FMD to define ED and at one-year landmark analysis.
Conclusions:
ED is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events at long-term follow-up in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction

