Effect of Surgical Care Team Consistency During Urologic Procedures on Surgical Efficiency and Perioperative Outcomes

To evaluate the effect of urologic surgical care team consistency on surgical efficiency and patient outcomes.

Patients undergoing major urologic surgery (prostatectomy, nephrectomy, or cystectomy) at a single institution from 2010 to 2019 were identified. A surgical care team comprised a certified surgical assistant, certified surgical technologist, and circulating nurse. Primary team member status was assigned on a quarterly basis to team members present for the highest proportion of a surgeon's cases. Surgical efficiency outcomes included time to first incision, procedure duration, and turnover time. Perioperative clinical outcomes included hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission and reoperation rates. Outcomes were compared according to team consistency and assessed via univariate and multivariable analyses.

Overall, 11,213 surgical procedures were included. Time to first incision, procedure duration, and turnover time were significantly lower in procedures performed with high-consistency teams (2-3 primary members) versus low-consistency teams (0-1 primary members) (all P <.001). After adjusting for patient-related variables, high-consistency teams were significantly associated with decreased time to first incision (estimate, -2.04 minutes; 95% CI, -2.68 to -1.41 minutes; P <.001) and turnover time (estimate, -7.23 minutes; 95% CI, -9.8 to -4.66 minutes; P <.001). For minimally invasive nephrectomy, high-consistency teams were associated with significantly decreased odds of prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P = .001). For robotic prostatectomy, high-consistency teams were associated with decreased procedure duration (estimate, -4.55 minutes; 95% CI, -7.48 to -1.62 minutes; P = .002).

Highly consistent surgical care teams were associated with improved surgical efficiency and patient outcomes.