Differences in Bacterial Translocation and Liver Injury in Ethanol Versus Diet-Induced Liver Disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are two of the most common etiologies of chronic liver disease worldwide. Changes in intestinal permeability and increased gut microbial translocation have been posited as important contributors to inflammation in both ALD and NAFLD. However, gut microbial translocation has not been compared between the two etiologies and can lead to better understanding of the differences in their pathogenesis to liver disease.

We compared serum and liver markers in the following five models of liver disease to understand the differences in the role of gut microbial translocation on liver disease progression caused by ethanol versus Western diet: (1) 8-week chronic ethanol feeding model. (2) 2-week chronic-plus-binge (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)) ethanol feeding model. (3) 2-week chronic-plus-binge (NIAAA) ethanol feeding model in microbiota-humanized gnotobiotic mice colonized with stool from patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis. (4) 20-week Western-diet-feeding model of NASH. (5) 20-week Western-diet-feeding model in microbiota-humanized gnotobiotic mice colonized with stool from NASH patients.

Translocation of bacterial lipopolysaccharide to the peripheral circulation was seen in both ethanol-induced and diet-induced liver disease, but translocation of bacteria itself was restricted to only ethanol-induced liver disease. Moreover, the diet-induced steatohepatitis models developed more significant liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis compared with ethanol-induced liver disease models, and this positively correlated with the level of lipopolysaccharide translocation.

More significant liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis are seen in diet-induced steatohepatitis, which positively correlates with translocation of bacterial components, but not intact bacteria.