Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Association between frailty, chronic conditions and socioeconomic status in community-dwelling older adults attending
Dee Mangin1, Jennifer Lawson2, Cathy Risdon2
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada mangind@mcmaster.ca.
Objectives:
Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome of loss of reserves in energy, physical ability, cognition and general health. Primary care is key in preventing and managing frailty, mindful of the social dimensions that contribute to its risk, prognosis and appropriate patient support. We studied associations between frailty levels and both chronic conditions and socioeconomic status (SES).
Design:
Cross-sectional cohort study SETTING: A practice-based research network (PBRN) in Ontario, Canada, providing primary care to 38 000 patients. The PBRN hosts a regularly updated database containing deidentified, longitudinal, primary care practice data.
Participants:
Patients aged 65 years or older, with a recent encounter, rostered to family physicians at the PBRN.
Intervention:
Physicians assigned a frailty score to patients using the 9-point Clinical Frailty Scale. We linked frailty scores to chronic conditions and neighbourhood-level SES to examine associations between these three domains.
Results:
Among 2043 patients assessed, the prevalence of low (scoring 1-3), medium (scoring 4-6) and high (scoring 7-9) frailty was 55.8%, 40.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The prevalence of five or more chronic diseases was 11% among low-frailty, 26% among medium-frailty and 44% among high-frailty groups (χ2=137.92, df 2, p<0.001). More disabling conditions appeared in the top 50% of conditions in the highest-frailty group compared with the low and medium groups. Increasing frailty was significantly associated with lower neighbourhood income (χ2=61.42, df 8, p<0.001) and higher neighbourhood material deprivation (χ2=55.24, df 8, p<0.001).
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates the triple disadvantage of frailty, disease burden and socioeconomic disadvantage. Frailty care needs a health equity approach: we demonstrate the utility and feasibility of collecting patient-level data within primary care. Such data can relate social risk factors, frailty and chronic disease towards flagging patients with the greatest need and creating targeted interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
Relationship Formation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

