Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

185
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
185
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

107
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
107
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

168
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
168
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

535
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
535
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

333
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
333
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

923
Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or...
923

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Altered Oscillatory Neural Dynamics Related to Word Prediction in Older Adult Readers.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025
Same author

Delayed testing in directed forgetting dissociates active and passive forms of forgetting.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

The role of prior familiarisation and meaningfulness of verbal and visual stimuli on directed forgetting.

Memory (Hove, England)·2024
Same author

The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
08:42

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression

Published on: May 19, 2015

10.8K

Differential Recruitment of Inhibitory Control Processes by Directed Forgetting and Thought Substitution.

Ryan J Hubbard1,2, Lili Sahakyan3,2

  • 1Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 rjhubba2@illinois.edu.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|February 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Intentional forgetting uses distinct neural mechanisms. Encoding suppression relies on inhibitory control, similar to stopping actions, while thought substitution employs separate processes.

Keywords:
EEGforgettinginhibitionmemory

More Related Videos

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

10.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
08:42

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression

Published on: May 19, 2015

10.8K
Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

10.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Intentional forgetting can be achieved through strategies like encoding suppression and thought substitution.
  • These strategies may involve different neural mechanisms, with encoding suppression potentially relying on prefrontal inhibition and thought substitution on contextual modulation.
  • Limited research has directly linked inhibitory processing to encoding suppression or investigated its role in thought substitution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether encoding suppression recruits inhibitory mechanisms.
  • To determine if thought substitution engages similar inhibitory processes.
  • To differentiate the neural mechanisms underlying encoding suppression and thought substitution.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-task design was employed, comparing behavioral and neural data from a Stop Signal task with a directed forgetting task.
  • Participants performed a Stop Signal task to assess inhibitory processing and a directed forgetting task using 'Forget' (encoding suppression) and 'Imagine' (thought substitution) cues.
  • Behavioral measures (reaction times) and neural activity (frontal beta power, classifier analysis) were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Stop Signal task performance correlated with the magnitude of encoding suppression but not thought substitution.
  • Right-frontal beta activity linked to stopping actions also correlated with successful encoding suppression, not thought substitution.
  • Classifiers trained on stopping success also predicted encoding suppression success, but not thought substitution success.

Conclusions:

  • Encoding suppression engages domain-general inhibitory control mechanisms, similar to those used in motor inhibition.
  • Thought substitution utilizes distinct neural mechanisms separate from inhibitory control.
  • These findings support an inhibitory account of directed forgetting and highlight the distinct neural underpinnings of different intentional forgetting strategies.