The importance of batch sensitization in missing value imputation

Data analysis is complex due to a myriad of technical problems. Amongst these, missing values and batch effects are endemic. Although many methods have been developed for missing value imputation (MVI) and batch correction respectively, no study has directly considered the confounding impact of MVI on downstream batch correction. This is surprising as missing values are imputed during early pre-processing while batch effects are mitigated during late pre-processing, prior to functional analysis. Unless actively managed, MVI approaches generally ignore the batch covariate, with unknown consequences. We examine this problem by modelling three simple imputation strategies: global (M1), self-batch (M2) and cross-batch (M3) first via simulations, and then corroborated on real proteomics and genomics data. We report that explicit consideration of batch covariates (M2) is important for good outcomes, resulting in enhanced batch correction and lower statistical errors. However, M1 and M3 are error-generating: global and cross-batch averaging may result in batch-effect dilution, with concomitant and irreversible increase in intra-sample noise. This noise is unremovable via batch correction algorithms and produces false positives and negatives. Hence, careless imputation in the presence of non-negligible covariates such as batch effects should be avoided.