Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simultaneous Microsurgery During Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction Reduces Ischemia Time Without Increasing Complications.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2025

Same author

Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap with Implant Placement has a Favorable Complication Profile Compared with Implant-Only or Flap-Only Reconstruction.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2024

Same author

Is the Vectra 3D Imaging System a Reliable Tool for Predicting Breast Mass?

Annals of plastic surgery·2020

Same author

Ear lobule reconstruction using nasal septal cartilage.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2013

Same author

Best face forward: Virtual modeling and custom device fabrication to optimize craniofacial vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2012

Same journal

Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Principles, Progress, and Perspectives.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Pediatric.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Acute Burns.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds: Updates on Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Updates in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Post Sarcoma.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Fillet Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Direct to Implant Reconstruction.

Jordan M S Jacobs¹, Charles Andrew Salzberg²

¹Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery

|February 22, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction offers a single-stage alternative to tissue expanders, potentially reducing recovery time. This method shows high success and patient satisfaction when carefully selected and performed.

Keywords:

Acellular dermal matrix Direct-to-implant One-stage Prepectoral Subpectoral

More Related Videos

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Area of Science:

Plastic Surgery
Oncology
Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

Implant-based breast reconstruction is a common post-mastectomy procedure.
Tissue expanders require multiple surgeries and extended treatment duration.
Direct-to-implant reconstruction offers a streamlined, one-stage approach.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
To compare direct-to-implant reconstruction with traditional tissue expander methods.

Main Methods:

Review of patient selection criteria for direct-to-implant reconstruction.
Analysis of surgical technique focusing on skin envelope preservation and implant placement.
Assessment of patient outcomes and satisfaction rates.

Main Results:

Direct-to-implant reconstruction bypasses the need for serial tissue expansion.
Successful outcomes are linked to appropriate patient selection and precise surgical execution.
High rates of success and patient satisfaction are achievable with this one-stage method.

Conclusions:

Direct-to-implant reconstruction is a viable and effective alternative for breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Careful patient selection and surgical technique are crucial for optimal results.
This approach can enhance patient satisfaction by simplifying the reconstruction process.