Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: February 1, 2018
Electrical stimulation to promote muscle and motor unit force and endurance after spinal cord injury
1Division of Physical Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract:
Fatigue is a common feature of paralysed skeletal muscle, hindering performance when subjected to functional electrical stimulation (ES) for movement. We asked whether (1) 20 Hz ES for 5% of each day (2.5 s on and 2.5 s off for 3 h) increases tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius muscle and motor unit (MU) endurance after paralysis by hemisection and deafferentation (HSDA), and (2) muscle length or loading affects their isometric contractile properties. The daily 5% ES increased muscle endurance, largely independent of muscle length or loading, but to a lesser extent than the daily 50% ES (2.5 s on and 2.5 s off for 24 h). The former was effective in counteracting the decline and slowing of muscle force promoted by the 50% ES. The altered muscle properties were confirmed at the MU level in final experiments once the properties had plateaued. Fast-fatigable MUs were converted to fatigue-intermediate and -resistant MUs that finally comprised ∼80% as compared to ∼10% of the total MU number in the daily 5% ES and the control normal groups, respectively. We conclude that the daily 5% ES regimen counteracts the fatigue of paralysed muscle without compromising contractile force, and thereby, is effective in conditioning muscle for effective movement. KEY POINTS: We asked whether 20 Hz electrical stimulation (ES) for 5% of each day (2.5 s on and 2.5 s off for 3 h; 5% ES) preserves medial gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscle and MU isometric contractile forces and increases their endurance after paralysis. Daily 5% ES promoted increased muscle endurance irrespective of the muscle length or loading but to a lesser extent than daily 50% ES (20 Hz ES 2.5 s on and 2.5 s off for 24 h). 5% ES was effective in counteracting decline and slowing of muscle force that resulted from 50% ES. Motor units (MUs) were converted from fast fatigable to fatigue intermediate and resistant MUs, comprising ∼80% as compared to ∼10% in the control normal groups. We conclude that the 5% ES regimen counteracts the fatigue of paralysed muscle without compromising contractile force, and thereby is effective in conditioning the muscle for effective movement.
More Related Videos
11:34Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
Published on: January 10, 2013
06:55Author Spotlight: Advancing Spinal Cord Stimulation - Exploring the Cellular Responses of Motor Neurons Through Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...