The Impact of Stopping Risk Assessment Checklists at a Specialist Personality Disorder Unit

Aim This study was conducted in Springbank Ward, a specialist ward for patients with emotionally unstable personality disorder, based in Cambridge, United Kingdom. We aimed to assess any change in incident frequency following the introduction of a new protocol for leaving the ward, in which patients are offered an optional conversation with staff in place of a formal risk assessment checklist. We also aimed to assess patient and staff perceptions of the change. Methods We used data routinely collected by Springbank Ward to compare incident frequency in the year before and after the change in protocol. We conducted structured interviews with patients and staff to obtain qualitative data on the new protocol and used thematic analysis to interpret the interview data. Results There were 466 incidents during the period before the change in protocol and 408 incidents in the period after. Adjusted for occupancy rate, there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of incidents. Patients and staff were generally satisfied with the new protocol, with an average satisfaction rating of 4.1 out of 5. Thematic analysis generated five main themes: 'taking ownership', 'autonomy versus restriction', 'staff-patient interaction', 'staff expertise' and 'protocol efficiency'. Conclusions Our study reveals high satisfaction with the new way risk is assessed and managed for patients leaving Springbank Ward, with an appreciation for its holistic and minimally restrictive approach. This was achieved without significantly increasing incident frequency.