Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Nasal drip of dexmedetomidine for optimal sedation during PICC insertion in pediatric burn care
Yanxu Lu1, Cheng Peng2, Li Xie3
1Xiangya Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Insights
Dexmedetomidine nasal drops offer a safe and effective alternative for pediatric sedation during peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement, showing higher success rates and faster onset than chloral hydrate. This novel approach may improve patient comfort and acceptance.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in children often requires prolonged sedation.
- Current sedatives like chloral hydrate have limited acceptance and suboptimal efficacy.
- Dexmedetomidine's efficacy for PICC insertion sedation is under-researched.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for pediatric sedation during PICC insertion.
- To compare dexmedetomidine nasal drops with traditional chloral hydrate sedation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 40 hospitalized children undergoing PICC insertion.
- Group A (n=15): received dexmedetomidine nasal drops (2 ug/kg).
- Group B (n=25): received chloral hydrate enema (0.5 mL/kg).
- Sedation status assessed using Ramsay's criteria.
- Outcomes included sedation success rate, onset time, and adverse reactions.
Main Results:
- Dexmedetomidine group showed a significantly higher success rate (93.3% vs 64.0%, P = .038).
- Sedation onset was significantly faster with dexmedetomidine (14.86 ± 2.57 min vs 19.06 ± 3.40 min, P = .001).
- No statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between groups (P = 1.000).
Conclusions:
- Nasal dexmedetomidine is a safe and effective sedative for pediatric PICC insertion.
- This method offers improved sedation efficacy and faster onset without significant adverse effects.
- It has the potential to reduce patient distress and improve procedural acceptance.
Background:
For peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserting, tranquil cooperation of children for an extended period is often required. Therefore, sedation is routinely induced clinically prior to PICC inserting. Chloral hydrate is a commonly used sedative for children. However, its clinical acceptance has remained low. And the sedation effect is non-satisfactory. Previous studies have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of intravenous/oral dosing or nasal dripping for sedation during the examinations of electrocardiography and computed tomography. Yet few studies have assessed the sedating efficacy of dexmedetomidine nasal drops for PICC inserting.
Methods:
From a cohort of 40 hospitalized patients scheduled for PICC inserting, 15 children employing a novel sedative mode of dexmedetomidine nasal drops at a dose of 2 ug/kg were assigned into group A while group B included another 25 children sedated routinely via an enema of 10% chloral hydrate at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg. The Ramsay's scoring criteria were utilized for assessing the status of sedation. Two groups were observed with regards to success rate of sedation, onset time of sedation and occurrences of adverse reactions.
Results:
Statistical inter-group differences existed in success rate and onset time of sedation. The success rate of group A was higher than that of group B (93.3% vs 64.0%, X2 = 4.302, P = .038 < 0.05). Group A had a faster onset of sedation than group B (14.86 ± 2.57 vs 19.06 ± 3.40 minutes, t = 3.781, P = .001 < 0.05). No inter-group difference of statistical significance existed in occurrence of adverse reactions (P = 1.000 > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of sedation in group A was higher than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .036 < 0.05).
Conclusions:
For sedating burn children, nasal dripping of dexmedetomidine is both safe and effective during PICC inserting. Without any obvious adverse reaction, it may relieve sufferings and enhance acceptance.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route

