Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Hypotheses on a tree: new error rates and testing strategies.
Marina Bogomolov1, Christine B Peterson2, Yoav Benjamini3
1The William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
We developed a novel multiple testing procedure for hierarchical hypotheses, controlling error rates effectively. This method offers improved statistical power in complex biological studies.
Area of Science:
- Statistical methodology
- Genomics
- Microbiome research
Background:
- Multiple testing procedures are crucial for controlling false discoveries in high-dimensional data.
- Existing methods may lack power or flexibility when dealing with structured hypotheses.
- Hierarchical organization of hypotheses is common in biological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel multiple testing procedure that controls global error rates at multiple resolution levels.
- To frame hypothesis testing within a hierarchical tree structure for enhanced interpretability.
- To develop a computationally efficient algorithm for this procedure.
Main Methods:
- A novel multiple testing procedure based on hierarchical hypothesis organization.
- Development and analysis of a fast algorithm for the proposed procedure.
- Simulations under various dependency structures of p-values to assess performance.
Main Results:
- The procedure controls relevant error rates under specified dependency assumptions.
- Simulations confirm desired guarantees across diverse dependency structures.
- The method demonstrates potential for increased statistical power compared to alternatives.
Conclusions:
- The proposed hierarchical multiple testing procedure offers robust error control and potential power gains.
- The method is applicable to complex biological datasets, such as gene expression and microbiome studies.
- This approach provides a valuable tool for analyzing structured hypothesis testing scenarios.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

