Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Collagen-based Scaffold Supports Tendon-to-bone Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair: An Integrated Translational Study.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Effects of Poly(ε-Caprolactone)-Nanohydroxyapatite Composition on 3D-Printed Scaffold Structural Properties.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same author

Gelatin-Polyvinyl Alcohol Microspheres for Controlled and Sustained Release of BMP-2 and VEGF Enhance Osteogenic and Angiogenic Cell Differentiation.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Topographical design principles for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Bioactive materials·2026
Same author

Comparison of innovative medical devices between China and the United States.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026
Same author

Bone matrix-inspired whitlockite porous ceramic with effects of autophagy activation contributes to bone regeneration.

Bioactive materials·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.1K

Nanocomposite Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Konstantinos Loukelis1, Zina A Helal2, Antonios G Mikos2

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Technology, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Nanoparticles enhance bioprinting inks for tissue engineering. This review explores using nanoscale additives in bioinks for bone, cartilage, dental, and cardiovascular tissue regeneration.

Keywords:
3D printingbonecardiovascularcartilagecompositeextrusioninkjetstereolithography

More Related Videos

Bioprinting Cellularized Constructs Using a Tissue-specific Hydrogel Bioink
08:34

Bioprinting Cellularized Constructs Using a Tissue-specific Hydrogel Bioink

Published on: April 21, 2016

16.9K
Bioprinting of Cartilage and Skin Tissue Analogs Utilizing a Novel Passive Mixing Unit Technique for Bioink Precellularization
09:03

Bioprinting of Cartilage and Skin Tissue Analogs Utilizing a Novel Passive Mixing Unit Technique for Bioink Precellularization

Published on: January 3, 2018

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.1K
Bioprinting Cellularized Constructs Using a Tissue-specific Hydrogel Bioink
08:34

Bioprinting Cellularized Constructs Using a Tissue-specific Hydrogel Bioink

Published on: April 21, 2016

16.9K
Bioprinting of Cartilage and Skin Tissue Analogs Utilizing a Novel Passive Mixing Unit Technique for Bioink Precellularization
09:03

Bioprinting of Cartilage and Skin Tissue Analogs Utilizing a Novel Passive Mixing Unit Technique for Bioink Precellularization

Published on: January 3, 2018

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Bioprinting utilizes live cells and biocompatible materials for tissue regeneration.
  • Polymeric hydrogels mimic native tissue extracellular matrix for 3D and 4D scaffolds.
  • Nanoscale additives, like nanoparticles, significantly tune bioink properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the incorporation of nanoparticles and nanoscale materials into printable bioinks.
  • To focus on applications in bone, cartilage, dental, and cardiovascular tissue engineering.
  • To discuss bioink classifications, formulation, and interactions with cells and mechanical properties.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of nanoparticle incorporation in bioinks.
  • Analysis of bioink properties and formulation for 3D and 4D bioprinting.
  • Examination of cellular and mechanical interactions with bioink additives.

Main Results:

  • Nanoparticle properties (shape, size, chemistry, concentration) modulate bioink performance.
  • Nanoscale additives offer tunability of mechanical, biological, structural, and physicochemical properties.
  • Diverse nanoparticle configurations are of interest for improved tissue engineering constructs.

Conclusions:

  • Nanoparticle-enhanced bioinks show promise for advanced tissue engineering.
  • Further investigation is needed to optimize nanoparticle use for specific tissue applications.
  • The field requires continued research into formulation and interaction mechanisms.