Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025
Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
Improving puncture accuracy in percutaneous CT-guided needle insertion with wireless inertial measurement unit: a
Chia-Ying Lin1, Wen-Ruei Tang2, Po-Chang Chiang1
1Department of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Objectives:
A novel method applying inertial measurement units (IMUs) was developed to assist CT-guided puncture, which enables real-time displays of planned and actual needle trajectories. The method was compared with freehand and laser protractor-assisted methods.
Methods:
The phantom study was performed by three operators with 8, 2, and 0 years of experience in CT-guided procedure conducted five consecutive needle placements for three target groups using three methods (freehand, laser protractor-assisted, or IMU-assisted method). The endpoints included mediolateral angle error and caudocranial angle error of the first pass, the procedure time, the total number of needle passes, and the radiation dose.
Results:
There was a significant difference in the number of needle passes (IMU 1.2 ± 0.42, laser protractor 2.9 ± 1.6, freehand 3.6 ± 2.0 time, p < 0.001), the procedure time (IMU 3.0 ± 1.2, laser protractor 6.4 ± 2.9, freehand 6.2 ± 3.1 min, p < 0.001), the mediolateral angle error of the first pass (IMU 1.4 ± 1.2, laser protractor 1.6 ± 1.3, freehand 3.7 ± 2.5 degree, p < 0.001), the caudocranial angle error of the first pass (IMU 1.2 ± 1.2, laser protractor 5.3 ± 4.7, freehand 3.9 ± 3.1 degree, p < 0.001), and the radiation dose (IMU 250.5 ± 74.1, laser protractor 484.6 ± 260.2, freehand 561.4 ± 339.8 mGy-cm, p < 0.001) among three CT-guided needle insertion methods.
Conclusion:
The wireless IMU improves the angle accuracy and speed of CT-guided needle punctures as compared with laser protractor guidance and freehand techniques.
Key Points:
• The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the number of needle passes (IMU 1.2 ± 0.42, laser protractor 2.9 ± 1.6, freehand 3.6 ± 2.0 time, p < 0.001). • The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the procedure time (IMU 3.0 ± 1.2, laser protractor 6.4 ± 2.9, freehand 6.2 ± 3.1 min, p < 0.001). • The IMU-assisted method showed a significant decrease in the mediolateral angle error of the first pass and the caudocranial angle error of the first pass.
More Related Videos
08:27Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
08:08Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019