Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
Improving puncture accuracy in percutaneous CT-guided needle insertion with wireless inertial measurement unit: a
Chia-Ying Lin1, Wen-Ruei Tang2, Po-Chang Chiang1
1Department of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
A new inertial measurement unit (IMU) method significantly improves accuracy and speed for CT-guided needle punctures. This IMU-assisted technique reduces needle passes, procedure time, and angle errors compared to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgical Navigation Technologies
Background:
- Computed tomography (CT)-guided procedures are crucial for accurate needle placement.
- Traditional methods like freehand and laser protractor guidance have limitations in real-time trajectory visualization.
- Improving precision and efficiency in CT-guided punctures is essential for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a novel inertial measurement unit (IMU)-assisted method for CT-guided needle punctures.
- To compare the performance of the IMU-assisted method against freehand and laser protractor-assisted techniques.
- To assess the impact of the IMU method on accuracy, procedure time, and radiation dose.
Main Methods:
- A phantom study was conducted involving three operators with varying experience levels.
- Five needle placements were performed for three target groups using freehand, laser protractor, and IMU-assisted methods.
- Key endpoints included mediolateral and caudocranial angle errors, procedure time, number of needle passes, and radiation dose.
Main Results:
- The IMU-assisted method demonstrated significantly fewer needle passes (1.2 ± 0.42) compared to laser protractor (2.9 ± 1.6) and freehand (3.6 ± 2.0).
- Procedure time was substantially reduced with the IMU method (3.0 ± 1.2 min) versus laser protractor (6.4 ± 2.9 min) and freehand (6.2 ± 3.1 min).
- The IMU method achieved significantly lower mediolateral and caudocranial angle errors on the first pass.
Conclusions:
- The wireless IMU-assisted method offers superior angle accuracy and speed for CT-guided needle punctures.
- This novel technique significantly outperforms laser protractor guidance and freehand methods.
- The IMU system enhances precision, reduces procedural time, and potentially lowers radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions.
More Related Videos
08:27Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
08:08Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019