Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2025

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
Published on: January 28, 2020
Reliability and Validity of a Flume-Based Maximal Oxygen Uptake Swimming Test
Elizabeth F Nagle1, Takashi Nagai2, Anne Beethe3
1Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Abstract:
A mode-specific swimming protocol to assess maximal aerobic uptake (VO2max) is vital to accurately evaluate swimming performance. A need exists for reliable and valid swimming protocols that assess VO2max in a flume environment. The purpose was to assess: (a) reliability and (b) "performance" validity of a VO2max flume protocol using the 457-m freestyle pool performance swim (PS) test as the criterion. Nineteen males (n = 9) and females (n = 10) (age, 28.5 ± 8.3 years.; height, 174.7 ± 8.2 cm; mass, 72.9 ± 12.5 kg; %body fat, 21.4 ± 5.9) performed two flume VO2max tests (VO2maxA and VO2maxB) and one PS test [457 m (469.4 ± 94.7 s)]. For test-retest reliability (Trials A vs. B), moderately strong relationships were established for VO2max (mL·kg-1·min-1)(r= 0.628, p = 0.002), O2pulse (mL O2·beat-1)(r = 0.502, p = 0.014), VEmax (L·min-1) (r = 0.671, p = 0.001), final test time (sec) (0.608, p = 0.004), and immediate post-test blood lactate (IPE (BLa)) (0.716, p = 0.001). For performance validity, moderately strong relationships (p < 0.05) were found between VO2maxA (r =-0.648, p = 0.005), O2pulse (r= -0.623, p = 0.008), VEmax (r = -0.509 p = 0.037), and 457-m swim times. The swimming flume protocol examined is a reliable and valid assessment of VO2max and offers an alternative for military, open water, or those seeking complementary forms of training to improve swimming performance.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Testing Water Quality
Reliability and Validity

