CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratio in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementias

Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) may manifest with atypical phenotypes, resembling behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS), phenotypes which typically have an underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau proteinopathy (FTLD-tau), such as Pick's disease, corticobasal degeneration (CBD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), or FTLD with TDP-43 proteinopathy (FTLD-TDP). CSF biomarkers total and phosphorylated tau (τ_T and τ_P-181), and amyloid beta with 42 and 40 amino acids (Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀) are biomarkers of AD pathology. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Aβ₄₂ to Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio in: (a) differentiating ADD vs. frontotemporal dementias; (b) patients with AD pathology vs. non-AD pathologies; (c) compare biomarker ratios and composite markers to single CSF biomarkers in the differentiation of AD from FTD; Methods: In total, 263 subjects were included (ADD: n = 98; bvFTD: n = 49; PSP: n = 50; CBD: n = 45; controls: n = 21). CSF biomarkers were measured by commercially available ELISAs (EUROIMMUN). Multiple biomarker ratios (Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀; τ_T/τ_P-181; τ_T/Aβ₄₂; τ_P-181/Aβ₄₂) and composite markers (t-tau: τ_T/(Aβ₄₂/Aβ40); p-tau: τ_P-181/(Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀) were calculated. ROC curve analysis was performed to compare AUCs of Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio and relevant composite markers between ADD and FTD, as defined clinically. BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria (abnormal τ_T, τ_P-181 Aβ₄₂, and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio) were used to re-classify all patients into AD pathology vs. non-AD pathologies, and ROC curve analysis was repeated to compare Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀; Results: Aβ₄₂ did not differ from Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio in the differentiation of ADD from FTD (AUCs 0.752 and 0.788 respectively; p = 0.212). The τ_T/Aβ₄₂ ratio provided maximal discrimination between ADD and FTD (AUC:0.893; sensitivity 88.8%, specificity 80%). BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria classified 60 patients as having AD pathology and 211 as non-AD. A total of 22 had discrepant results and were excluded. Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio was superior to Aβ₄₂ in the differentiation of AD pathology from non-AD pathology (AUCs: 0.939 and 0.831, respectively; p < 0.001). In general, biomarker ratios and composite markers were superior to single CSF biomarkers in both analyses.

Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio is superior to Aβ₄₂ in identifying AD pathology, irrespective of the clinical phenotype. CSF biomarker ratios and composite markers provide higher diagnostic accuracy compared to single CSF biomarkers.