Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.2K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K
Horney's Sociocultural Approach01:27

Horney's Sociocultural Approach

601
Karen Horney's psychoanalytic theories emphasize the potential for self-realization and the importance of addressing social and cultural, rather than biological, factors in personality development. She challenged traditional Freudian views, particularly Freud's concept of "penis envy," which she argued stemmed from cultural influences rather than inherent biological differences. Horney believed that any sense of inferiority in women was a result of societal conditioning, such as...
601
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.7K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.7K
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

59
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
59

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How semantic context and temporal dynamics affect egocentric and allocentric spatial representations.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Visual attention towards virtual humans as a function of spatial distance and emotional expression: an eye-tracking study.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

How Action Shapes Temporal Judgments: A Study in Brain Damaged Patients Through Immersive Virtual Reality.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Cognitive load in switching between egocentric and allocentric spatial frames of reference: a pupillometry study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Interpersonal Distance Preferences in Deaf Signers and Hearing Individuals.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Early Spatio-Temporal and Cognitive Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.3K

Social Context and Tool Use Can Modulate Interpersonal Comfort Space.

Antonella Ferrara1, Mariachiara Rapuano1, Gennaro Ruggiero1

  • 1Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|February 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Motor plasticity extends reaching space regardless of social context. However, comfort space, representing personal proximity tolerance, expands only when social cues are present during tool use.

Keywords:
action-social spacemotor plasticityreaching-comfort distancesocial contexttool-use

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.3K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • The representation of peripersonal space involves distinct reach-action and comfort-social dimensions.
  • Research on motor plasticity, particularly from tool use, has yielded mixed results regarding shared sensorimotor bases for these spaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if motor plasticity from tool use similarly modulates reach-action and comfort-social spaces.
  • To examine the influence of social context on these spatial representations following motor plasticity.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized control trial with 62 participants, measuring reaching and comfort distances before and after tool use.
  • Three experimental conditions: tool use with a social stimulus (mannequin), tool use alone, and tool use with an object (control).

Main Results:

  • Reaching distance significantly increased after tool use across all conditions.
  • Comfort distance extended only in the group using a tool in the presence of a social stimulus (mannequin).

Conclusions:

  • Motor plasticity differentially affects reach-action and comfort-social spaces.
  • Reaching space is primarily modulated by motor plasticity, while comfort space is sensitive to social context cues.