Related Experiment Videos
Antimicrobial vs placebo prophylaxis in noncardiac thoracic surgery
JAMA
|March 23, 1979
Summary
Prophylactic cephalosporins did not reduce postoperative infections in thoracic surgery patients. However, this antibiotic therapy increased adverse events like drug fever and abnormal renal function.
Area of Science:
- Medicine
- Surgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Postoperative infections are a significant concern in noncardiac thoracic surgery.
- Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to prevent surgical site infections.
- The efficacy and safety of cephalosporins in this specific patient population require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic cephalosporins in reducing postoperative infections.
- To assess the safety profile of prophylactic cephalosporins in patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- 57 patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery were enrolled.
- Patients received either cephalosporin therapy (28 patients) or a placebo (29 patients).
Main Results:
- The incidence of postoperative infections was similar between the cephalosporin group (17.8%) and the placebo group (17.2%).
- No significant differences were observed in WBC counts, fever, hospitalization duration, or hypersensitivity reactions.
- Adverse events such as drug fever, phlebitis, and abnormal renal function were more frequent in the cephalosporin group.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic cephalosporins did not demonstrate efficacy in preventing postoperative infections in noncardiac thoracic surgery.
- Cephalosporin therapy was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, including drug fever and renal dysfunction.