Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical trials in migraine: parallel versus crossover studies.

R S Kunkel1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

Neuroepidemiology
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

This study compares parallel and crossover designs for migraine prophylactic drug trials. While both have pros and cons, the parallel design is favored by most headache investigators.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical manifestations of migraine.

Clinical cornerstone·2003
Same author

Survey of migraineurs referred to headache specialists: care, satisfaction, and outcomes.

Neurology·2000
Same author

Impact of headache education program in the workplace.

Neurology·1999
Same author

Dosing of oral sumatriptan: a review of our first 104 patients.

Headache·1998
Same author

Headache classification.

Neurology·1997
Same author

Reversible cerebellar perfusion in familial hemiplegic migraine.

Lancet (London, England)·1996

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Prophylactic drug studies for migraine are crucial for treatment development.
  • Common clinical trial designs include parallel and crossover formats.
  • Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each design is important for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of parallel and crossover study designs in migraine prophylaxis.
  • To explore the reasons behind the prevalent preference for the parallel study design among headache investigators.

Main Methods:

  • A review and discussion of the pros and cons of parallel and crossover study designs.
  • Analysis of investigator preferences in migraine prophylactic drug research.

Main Results:

  • Both parallel and crossover designs present distinct benefits and drawbacks for migraine prophylactic studies.
  • A majority of headache investigators express a preference for the parallel study design.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of study design impacts the interpretation and efficiency of migraine prophylactic drug trials.
  • Investigator preference leans towards the parallel design, necessitating an understanding of its underlying rationale.

Related Experiment Videos