Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

The Rigid Tube as an Alternative in Controlling the Problematic Airway
Published on: June 6, 2020
Comparison of the McGRATHTM Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated
Jong-Yeop Kim1, Seonghyeok Park2, Minho Oh2
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients' morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
Insights
The McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve intubation success rates or speed compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult airways. However, it offered a better glottic view during the procedure.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Airway Management
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Difficult intubation poses significant risks to patient morbidity and mortality during anesthesia.
- Video laryngoscopes, like the McGRATH, are known to enhance laryngeal visualization.
- Conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes are standard for orotracheal intubation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation.
- To evaluate device performance in simulated difficult airway scenarios.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving patients undergoing general anesthesia.
- Patients were assigned to either the Macintosh laryngoscope (n=50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n=45) group.
- Simulated difficult airway conditions were created using manual in-line stabilization and a soft cervical collar.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in intubation success rate within 30 seconds between groups (88.0% vs. 80.0%).
- The McGRATH group demonstrated a significantly better glottic grade (p=0.029).
- No significant differences in intubation time, oral bleeding, or tooth injury rates were observed.
Conclusions:
- The McGRATH video laryngoscope did not enhance intubation success rates or reduce intubation time in simulated difficult airways.
- The McGRATH provided superior glottic visualization compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope.
- Further research may explore specific patient populations or techniques to leverage improved visualization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Tracheostomy Suctioning II: Procedure
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

