Missed blunt cerebrovascular injuries using current screening criteria - The time for liberalized screening is now

Diagnostic Criteria Study BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality associated with ischemic stroke attributable to blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) warrant aggressive screening. The Denver Criteria (DC) and Expanded Denver Criteria (eDC) have imprecise elements that can be difficult and subjective in application and can delay or prevent screening. We hypothesize these screening criteria lack adequate ability to consistently identify BCVI and that the use of a liberalized screening approach with CT angiography (CTA) is superior without increasing risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

This was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of trauma patients who presented between 2015-2020 with radiographically confirmed BCVI diagnosed using each institutions' liberalized screening protocol, defined as automatic CTA of the head and neck for all patients undergoing head and neck CT. Outcomes of interest included AKI, stroke, and death due to BCVI. Outcomes were reported as frequency, percent, and 95% confidence interval as calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method. Incidence of medical follow-up within 1 year of first medical visit was quantified as the median and inter-quartile range of days to follow-up visit.

We identified 433 BCVI patients with a mean age of 45.2 (standard deviation 18.9) years, 256 men and 177 women, 1.73 m (0.10) tall, and weighed 80.3 kg (20.3). Forty-one patients had strokes (9.5% [95% confidence interval 6.9, 12.6] and 12 patients (2.8% [1.4, 4.5]) had mortality attributable to BCVI. Of 433 total cases, 132 (30.5% [26.2, 35.1]) would have been missed by DC and 150 (34.6% [30.2, 39.3]) by eDC. Incidence of AKI in our BCVI population was 6 (1.4% [0.01, 3.0]).

BCVI would be missed over 30% of the time using the DC and eDC compared to liberalized use of screening CTA. Risk of AKI due to CTA did not occur at a clinically meaningful level, supporting liberal CTA screening.