Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Cutting balloon to optimize predilation for stent implantation: The COPS randomized trial
Antonio Mangieri1, Roberto Nerla2, Fausto Castriota2
1Department of Cardio Center IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
High-pressure cutting balloons (CB) offer a safe and effective alternative for treating calcified coronary lesions, resulting in larger minimal stent areas and improved stent symmetry compared to noncompliant balloons.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Calcified coronary lesions pose a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of high-pressure cutting balloons (CB) for these lesions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of high-pressure cutting balloons (CB) versus noncompliant balloons (NCB) in treating calcified coronary lesions.
- To evaluate stent expansion and symmetry following treatment with CB versus NCB.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study comparing CB and NCB in patients with calcified lesions (intravascular ultrasound >100° calcium).
- Primary endpoints included final minimal stent area (MSA) and stent symmetry.
- Secondary endpoints assessed device failure and 1-year clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Cutting balloon (CB) treatment resulted in a significantly larger final minimal stent area (MSA) compared to noncompliant balloon (NCB) (8.1 vs. 7.3 mm², p=0.035).
- Higher stent eccentricity was observed with CB use (0.84 vs. 0.8, p=0.013).
- One-year clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups, with three device failures in the CB group.
Conclusions:
- High-pressure cutting balloon (CB) treatment demonstrates a favorable safety profile for calcified coronary lesions.
- CB use is associated with improved stent expansion (larger MSA) and better stent placement (higher eccentricity) compared to NCB.
- The study supports CB as a viable option for complex calcified lesions.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
12:00Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014