A Change in the Trend of Quality Reporting in Leprosy Trials: A Systematic Review

Pugazhenthan Thangaraju1, Pranav Gaurangbhai Sheth1, Hemasri Velmurugan1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Abstract

Insights

Leprosy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show improved reporting quality since 2010. However, overall reporting quality for this stigmatized disease remains suboptimal, necessitating further enhancements.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, persists as a significant public health and social issue in underdeveloped nations.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for leprosy face unique challenges due to the disease's social stigma and complex nature.
  • Despite advances, leprosy eradication efforts remain hampered, highlighting the need for robust clinical trial data.

Approach:

  • This study evaluated the reporting quality of leprosy RCTs published after 2010.
  • The Consolidated Standard for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist was employed for assessment.
  • Reporting quality was compared between trials published before and after the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.

Key Points:

  • Nineteen eligible leprosy RCTs were analyzed.
  • Reporting compliance varied, with only 4 trials exceeding 75% adherence to CONSORT guidelines.
  • A statistically significant improvement in reporting quality was observed for trials published after 2010 compared to those before.
  • The highest compliance reached 86.48%, while the lowest was 32.43%.

Conclusions:

  • While the CONSORT guidelines have led to improved reporting of leprosy RCTs, the overall quality remains insufficient.
  • Further efforts are needed to enhance the quality of scientific reporting for leprosy clinical trials.
  • Addressing reporting deficiencies is crucial for advancing leprosy control and eradication strategies.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.1K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.9K
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
933
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
153
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
466
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
319