Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

A Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay TB-MBLA
Published on: April 30, 2020
A Change in the Trend of Quality Reporting in Leprosy Trials: A Systematic Review
Pugazhenthan Thangaraju1, Pranav Gaurangbhai Sheth1, Hemasri Velmurugan1
1Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Background:
Leprosy is a communicable disease caused by bacteria Mycobacterium leprae. Despite all attempts, it has not been eradicated in several underdeveloped nations since the start of the antibiotic age. It's a social issue as well as a stigmatised disease. Due to these restrictions, randomised controlled trials in leprosy confront numerous obstacles, which are reflected in the quality of study reporting.
Objectives:
The objective of this study is to use the Consolidated Standard for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist to assess the quality of leprosy trial reporting.
Methods:
We assess the quality of reporting of randomised control trials on leprosy conducted after 2010 in the PubMed database, using the CONSORT checklist 2010. Second, we compare the quality of RCT reporting before and after the release of the CONSORT guidelines in 2010.
Results:
A total of 19 full-text eligible articles were examined and included in the final list of articles, which were then evaluated further. 4 out of 19 trials had a compliance percentage of more than 75%. 6 out of 19 trials had compliance percentage of 50% to 75%. 9 trials had a compliance percentage of below 50%. Highest compliance was 86.48% and the lowest compliance was 32.43%. When compared with trials before 2010, we could see an improvement in some criteria showing a statistically significant rise in comparison with trials conducted before 2010.
Conclusion:
Leprosy is still a concern in developing countries, which have failed to eradicate the disease despite their best efforts and resources. The compliance of leprosy related RCTs has improved since the introduction of the CONSORT guidelines, but the quality of reporting still remains on the lower side.
Insights
Leprosy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show improved reporting quality since 2010. However, overall reporting quality for this stigmatized disease remains suboptimal, necessitating further enhancements.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, persists as a significant public health and social issue in underdeveloped nations.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for leprosy face unique challenges due to the disease's social stigma and complex nature.
- Despite advances, leprosy eradication efforts remain hampered, highlighting the need for robust clinical trial data.
Approach:
- This study evaluated the reporting quality of leprosy RCTs published after 2010.
- The Consolidated Standard for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist was employed for assessment.
- Reporting quality was compared between trials published before and after the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.
Key Points:
- Nineteen eligible leprosy RCTs were analyzed.
- Reporting compliance varied, with only 4 trials exceeding 75% adherence to CONSORT guidelines.
- A statistically significant improvement in reporting quality was observed for trials published after 2010 compared to those before.
- The highest compliance reached 86.48%, while the lowest was 32.43%.
Conclusions:
- While the CONSORT guidelines have led to improved reporting of leprosy RCTs, the overall quality remains insufficient.
- Further efforts are needed to enhance the quality of scientific reporting for leprosy clinical trials.
- Addressing reporting deficiencies is crucial for advancing leprosy control and eradication strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

