Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
Strong versus weak embodiment: Spatial iconicity in physical, abstract, and social semantic categories
José A León1, José Ángel Martínez-Huertas2, José David Moreno1
1Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Iván Pavlo, Madrid, Spain.
Background:
Perceptual and action systems seem to be related to complex cognitive processes, but the scope of grounded or embodied cognition has been questioned. Zwaan and Yaxley (2003) proposed that cognitive processes of making semantic relatedness judgments can be facilitated when word pairs are presented in ways that their referents maintain their iconic configuration rather than their reverse-iconic configuration (the spatial iconicity effect). This effect has been observed in different semantic categories using specific experiments, but it is known that embodiment is highly dependent on task demands.
Method:
The present study analyzed the spatial iconicity effect in three semantic categories (physical, abstract, and social) using the same experimental criteria to determine the scope of embodied cognition. In this reaction-time experiment, 75 participants judged the semantic relatedness of 384 word pairs whose experimental items were presented in their iconic or reverse-iconic configurations.
Results:
Two mixed-effects models with crossed random effects revealed that the interaction between word meaning and spatial position was present only for physical concepts but neither for abstract nor social concepts.
Conclusions:
Within the framework of strong and weak embodiment theories, the data support weak embodiment theory as the most explicative one.
Related Concept Videos
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Natural and Artificial Concepts
Visual Agnosia
Stereotype Content Model
Gestalt Principles of Perception

