Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Don't worry about the anchor-item setting in longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments
Xinyue Yu1, Peida Zhan1,2, Qipeng Chen1
1School of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China, Jinhua, China.
Abstract:
Previous longitudinal assessment experiences for multidimensional continuous latent constructs suggested that the set of anchor items should be proportionally representative of the total test forms in content and statistical characteristics and that they should be loaded on every domain in multidimensional tests. In such cases, the set of items containing the unit Q-matrix, which is the smallest unit representing the whole test, seems to be the natural choice for anchor items. Two simulation studies were conducted to verify the applicability of these existing insights to longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments (LDAs). The results mainly indicated that there is no effect on the classification accuracy regardless of the unit Q-matrix in the anchor items, and even not including the anchor items has no impact on the classification accuracy. The findings of this brief study may ease practitioners' worries regarding anchor-item settings in the practice application of longitudinal LDAs.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Studies
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Longitudinal Research
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...

