Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.5K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

63.9K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
63.9K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

10.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
10.0K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

4.6K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
4.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Common Factors in Visual Illusions: A Review.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Silver bullets and sensory horizons.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Examining the relationship between ssVEP and psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity, grating acuity, and orientation discrimination.

iScience·2026
Same author

Electroencephalography Microstates-A Biomarker for Psychosis?

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

A Non-Invasive, MRCP-Based BCI for Online Communication.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.6K

Do we really measure what we think we are measuring?

Dario Gordillo1, Janir Ramos da Cruz1,2,3, Dana Moreno1

  • 1Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Iscience
|February 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Scientific tests, like those using electroencephalogram (EEG) brain activity, may not yield consistent results. Different analysis methods reveal weak correlations between EEG features and cognitive tasks or age groups.

Keywords:
Cognitive neuroscienceTechniques in neuroscience

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.6K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Empirical science tests often assume representativeness, where similar tests yield similar results.
  • This assumption is crucial for reliable scientific conclusions and reproducibility.
  • Resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) is a common tool in neuroscience research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the representativeness assumption using resting-state EEG data.
  • To determine if different EEG analysis methods produce consistent findings.
  • To assess the relationship between EEG features, cognitive tasks, and age differences.

Main Methods:

  • Employed multiple, diverse analysis methods on resting-state EEG data, deviating from typical single-method approaches.
  • Correlated various EEG features with performance on cognitive tasks.
  • Compared EEG features between younger and older participant groups.
  • Utilized cross-validated regression analysis to predict cognitive task performance from EEG features.

Main Results:

  • Numerous EEG features showed significant correlations with cognitive tasks, but these features exhibited weak inter-correlations.
  • Significant differences in EEG features were observed between younger and older adults, yet pairwise comparisons revealed weak correlations.
  • EEG features demonstrated poor predictive power for cognitive task performance in cross-validated regression models.

Conclusions:

  • The representativeness assumption of scientific tests, particularly in EEG research, may not hold.
  • The choice of analysis method significantly impacts findings from resting-state EEG.
  • Weak inter-correlations among EEG features and their limited predictive ability for cognitive performance raise concerns about construct validity.