Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Measurement of Extracellular Ion Fluxes Using the Ion-selective Self-referencing Microelectrode Technique
Published on: May 3, 2015
Value assignment and uncertainty evaluation for anion and single-element reference solutions incorporating historical
Brian E Lang1, John L Molloy2, Thomas W Vetter2
1Inorganic Chemical Metrology Group, Chemical Sciences Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8391, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899-8391, USA. brian.lang@nist.gov.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) developed a new method to evaluate uncertainty in certified reference materials. This approach improves accuracy by blending historical data with new measurements, potentially reducing uncertainties by 20%.
Area of Science:
- Metrology and Analytical Chemistry
- Reference Material Characterization
- Uncertainty Evaluation
Background:
- The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) certifies mass fractions in single-element and anion solutions using gravimetric and instrumental methods.
- Current uncertainty evaluation includes method-specific, stability, and between-method difference components.
- Historically, between-method differences were based solely on current material characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and justify a new procedure for evaluating between-method differences in uncertainty calculations for certified reference materials.
- To leverage historical data on preparation and measurement methods for improved uncertainty assessment.
- To enhance the overall quality of uncertainty evaluations for NIST standard reference materials.
Main Methods:
- A novel procedure blending historical between-method differences with newly observed differences.
- Utilizes long-standing preparation (40 years) and instrumental (20 years) methods.
- Applies to single-element and anion solutions, including inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy and ion chromatography.
Main Results:
- The new procedure is expected to yield relative expanded uncertainties approximately 20% smaller than current methods.
- Demonstrates improved quality of uncertainty evaluations by incorporating historical data on method performance and solution stability.
- Historical data shows consistent certified values and uncertainties within comparable solution series.
Conclusions:
- The new blending procedure offers a more robust and accurate method for uncertainty evaluation in certified reference materials.
- Incorporating historical data significantly enhances the reliability of uncertainty assessments over the lifetime of the solutions.
- This advancement improves the quality and precision of NIST's certified reference materials.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
EDTA: Indirect and Alkalimetric Titration
Potentiometry: Types of Electrodes
The Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) is a widely used reference electrode that maintains zero potential across all temperatures. However, its need for a continuous hydrogen gas supply renders it impractical for everyday use.
An alternative to SHE is the Saturated Calomel Electrode (SCE). This electrode features an...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Precipitation of Ions
The equation that describes the equilibrium between solid calcium carbonate and its solvated ions is:
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

