Q.Clear reconstruction for reducing the scanning time for 68 Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging
Weiwei Ruan1,2,3, Chunxia Qin1,2,3, Fang Liu1,2,3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1277 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Purpose:
This study aims to determine whether Q.Clear positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction may reduce tracer injection dose or shorten scanning time in 68Gallium-labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (68 Ga-FAPI) PET/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected cases of 68 Ga-FAPI whole-body imaging performed on integrated PET/MR. PET images were reconstructed using three different methods: ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction with full scanning time, OSEM reconstruction with half scanning time, and Q.Clear reconstruction with half scanning time. We then measured standardized uptake values (SUVs) within and around lesions, alongside their volumes. We also evaluated image quality using lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We then compared these metrics across the three reconstruction techniques using statistical methods.
Results:
Q.Clear reconstruction significantly increased SUVmax and SUVmean within lesions (more than 30%) and reduced their volumes in comparison with OSEM reconstruction. Background SUVmax also increased significantly, while background SUVmean showed no difference. Average L/B values for Q.Clear reconstruction were only marginally higher than those from OSME reconstruction with half-time. SNR decreased significantly in Q.Clear reconstruction compared with OSEM reconstruction with full time (but not half time). Differences between Q.Clear and OSEM reconstructions in SUVmax and SUVmean values within lesions were significantly correlated with SUVs within lesions.
Conclusions:
Q.Clear reconstruction was useful for reducing PET injection dose or scanning time while maintaining the image quality. Q.Clear may affect PET quantification, and it is necessary to establish diagnostic recommendations based on Q.Clear results for Q.Clear application.
More Related Videos
08:31Visualization and Quantification of Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues in Mice using [18F]FDG Micro-PET/MR Imaging
Published on: July 1, 2021
08:36Multi-Tracer Studies of Brain Oxygen and Glucose Metabolism Using a Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scanner
Published on: June 7, 2024
