Declining Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure: Fact or Myth?
Francisco Leyva1, Carsten W Israel2, Jagmeet Singh3
1Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom (F.L.).
Insights
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in heart failure (HF) patients may not be declining as widely believed. This review questions the perceived decrease in SCD and advocates for continued use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in HF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Sudden Cardiac Death Studies
Background:
- Growing belief that sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk is decreasing in heart failure (HF) patients on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).
- Editorials suggest arrhythmic SCD is no longer a significant threat for HF patients undergoing GDMT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate whether SCD risk has truly declined in HF trials and real-world settings.
- To assess if residual SCD risk warrants continued use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) despite GDMT.
- To examine the translation of HF trial findings to clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing data from heart failure clinical trials.
- Analysis of real-world evidence regarding SCD incidence.
- Critical appraisal of studies on GDMT and device therapy in HF.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests SCD has not decreased in HF trials or in real-world populations.
- Data from trials not adhering to guideline-directed device therapy (GDDТ) are insufficient to delay ICD implantation.
- Challenges exist in applying HF trial results to diverse real-world patient populations.
Conclusions:
- The perceived decline in SCD risk among HF patients may be inaccurate.
- ICD therapy remains crucial for managing residual SCD risk in chronic HF.
- Future HF trials should incorporate GDDТ to better define the role of ICDs.
Abstract:
The notion that the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with heart failure (HF) is declining seems to be gaining traction. Numerous editorials and commentaries have suggested that SCD, specifically arrhythmic SCD, is no longer a significant risk for patients with HF on guideline-directed medical therapy. In this review, we question whether the risk of SCD has indeed declined in HF trials and in the real world. We also explore whether, despite relative risk reductions, the residual SCD risk after guideline-directed medical therapy still suggests a need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Among our arguments is that SCD has not decreased in HF trials, nor in the real world. Moreover, we argue that data from HF trials, which have not adhered to guideline-directed device therapy, do not obviate or justify delays to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. In this context, we underline the challenges of translating the findings of HF randomized, controlled trials of guideline-directed medical therapy to the real world. We also make the case for HF trials that adhere to current guideline-directed device therapy so that we can better understand the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in chronic HF.
More Related Videos
05:15Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
07:49Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
