Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

612
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
612
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

238
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
238
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

195
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
195
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

357
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
357
Heart Sounds01:15

Heart Sounds

2.1K
Heart sounds are generated by the turbulence in blood flow due to the closing of heart valves. These sounds are best perceived slightly away from the valves, where the blood flow disseminates the sound.
Auscultation is the process of listening to these internal body sounds using a stethoscope. The heart produces four types of sounds, but only two—S1 and S2—can usually be heard with a stethoscope.
S1, also known as the "lub" sound, is caused by the closure of atrioventricular (A-V)...
2.1K
Methods of Classification and Identification01:28

Methods of Classification and Identification

76
Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...
76

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Event-Based Vision at the Edge: A Review.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Context-Aware Multi-Agent Architecture for Wildfire Insights.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Energy-Efficient Dynamic Workflow Scheduling in Cloud Environments Using Deep Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Elephant Sound Classification Using Deep Learning Optimization.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

PoachNet: Predicting Poaching Using an Ontology-Based Knowledge Graph.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

ESC-NAS: Environment Sound Classification Using Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search for the Edge.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.2K

Forest Sound Classification Dataset: FSC22.

Meelan Bandara1, Roshinie Jayasundara1, Isuru Ariyarathne1

  • 1Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed FSC22, a new benchmark dataset for forest environmental sound classification. This dataset addresses the lack of specialized data, improving deep learning models for identifying forest sounds and activities.

Keywords:
Freesounddeep learningenvironment sound classificationforest acoustic datasetmachine learning

More Related Videos

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
04:04

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning

Published on: July 22, 2025

212
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds
13:05

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.2K
Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
04:04

Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning

Published on: July 22, 2025

212
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds
13:05

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI with Auditory Stimulation in Songbirds

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.3K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Computer Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Environmental Sound Classification (ESC) is increasingly important, with forest ESC applications in monitoring illegal activities.
  • Existing generic datasets limit the accuracy of deep learning models for specific forest sound identification.
  • A specialized benchmark dataset is needed to improve the reliability of forest sound classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce FSC22, a novel benchmark dataset for forest environmental sound classification.
  • To provide a comprehensive resource for training and validating deep learning models in forest sound analysis.
  • To facilitate research in forest observatory tasks and the identification of specific forest acoustic events.

Main Methods:

  • Compilation of 2025 sound clips categorized into 27 distinct acoustic classes representative of forest environments.
  • Detailed documentation of the dataset preparation procedure.
  • Validation of the FSC22 dataset using various baseline deep learning sound classification models.

Main Results:

  • The FSC22 dataset effectively addresses the gap in specialized forest sound data.
  • Baseline models demonstrate the utility of FSC22 for sound classification tasks.
  • Comparative analysis highlights FSC22's advantages over existing generic environmental sound datasets.

Conclusions:

  • FSC22 serves as a crucial benchmark for advancing forest environmental sound classification research.
  • The dataset enables more accurate and reliable deep learning predictions for forest sound events.
  • FSC22 is a valuable resource for researchers and developers in forest monitoring and related applications.