Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Towards a Machine Learning Driven Trust Management Heuristic for the Internet of Vehicles
Sarah Ali Siddiqui1,2, Adnan Mahmood1, Quan Z Sheng1
1School of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Abstract:
The rapid proliferation of the emerging yet promising notion of the Internet-of-Vehicles (IoV) has led to the development of a variety of conventional trust assessment schemes to tackle insider attackers. The primary reliance of these frameworks is on the accumulation of individual trust attributes. While aggregating these influential parameters, weights are often associated with each individual attribute to reflect its impact on the final trust score. It is of paramount importance that such weights be precise to lead to an accurate trust assessment. Moreover, the value of the minimum acceptable trust threshold employed for the identification of dishonest vehicles needs to be carefully defined to avoid delayed or erroneous detection. This paper employs an IoT data set from CRAWDAD by suitably transforming it into an IoV format. This data set encompasses information regarding 18,226 interactions among 76 nodes, both honest and dishonest. First, the influencing parameters (i.e., packet delivery ratio, familiarity, timeliness and interaction frequency) were computed, and two feature matrices were formed. The first matrix (FM1) takes into account all the pairwise individual parameters as individual features, whereas the second matrix (FM2) considers the average of all pairwise computations performed for each individual parameter as one feature. Subsequently, unsupervised learning is employed to achieve the ground truth prior to applying supervised machine learning algorithms for classification purposes. It is worth noting that Subspace KNN yielded a perfect precision, recall, and the F1-score equal to 1 for individual parametric scores, whereas Subspace Discriminant returned an ideal precision, recall, and the F1-score equal to 1 for mean parametric scores. It is also evident from extensive simulations that FM2 yielded more accurate classification results compared to FM1. Furthermore, decision boundaries among honest and dishonest vehicles have also been computed for respective feature matrices.
Related Concept Videos
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Design Example: Automobile Ignition System
One can generate a large voltage using a car battery of 12 volts with the help of inductors. Inductors are known for opposing...
Stereotype Content Model
Machines: Problem Solving II

