High Concordance between D:A:Dr and the Framingham Risk Score in Brazilians Living with HIV

Vitor Souza1, Victória Valadares1, Thais Dias1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Medical School, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40110-060, BA, Brazil.

Viruses
|February 28, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Cardiovascular risk scores for people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Brazil were evaluated. The D:A:Dr score shows strong agreement with the Framingham Risk Score, suggesting it as a viable alternative for assessing cardiovascular risk in PLHIV.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health

Background:

  • People living with HIV (PLHIV) face double the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD).
  • Accurate cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment is crucial for PLHIV, yet no validated calculator exists for this population in Brazil.
  • Existing CVR tools may not fully capture the specific needs of PLHIV.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement between three cardiovascular risk scores in Brazilian PLHIV.
  • To determine the suitability of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk Score, and the D:A:Dr score for assessing CVR in PLHIV.
  • To identify a reliable CVR calculator for PLHIV in Brazil.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 265 PLHIV aged 40-74 years in Brazil.
  • Comparison of CVR using weighted Kappa coefficient and Bland-Altman plots for FRS, ASCVD, and D:A:Dr scores.
  • Analysis of demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, hypertension, and viral load.

Main Results:

  • Almost perfect agreement was found between the D:A:Dr score and FRS (k=0.82).
  • Substantial agreement was observed between FRS and ASCVD (k=0.74), and between D:A:Dr and ASCVD (k=0.70).
  • Increased discordance between scores was noted at higher CVR levels, as indicated by Bland-Altman plots.

Conclusions:

  • The Framingham Risk Score and the D:A:Dr score are adequate for classifying CVR in Brazilian PLHIV.
  • The D:A:Dr score is a suitable alternative to the FRS for assessing cardiovascular risk in this population in Brazil.
  • International guidelines support the use of D:A:Dr, reinforcing its utility for PLHIV care.

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
267
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
195
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
203
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
466
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
678
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
12.1K