Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.3K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.6K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.0K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.0K
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

17.9K
Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...
17.9K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

34.6K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.6K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.0K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SHREC 2025: Protein surface shape retrieval including electrostatic potential.

Computers & graphics·2026
Same author

DAQplugin: Deep Learning based Real-time Model Evaluation Plugin for ChimeraX.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Direct Detection and Atomic Modeling of Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps Using Deep Learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

PL-PatchSurfer3: improved structure-based virtual screening for structure variation using 3D Zernike descriptors.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same author

RNAdetector: fast and accurate predictor of RNA type-specific binding residues in protein sequences.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Computational prediction of disordered binding regions.

Sushmita Basu1, Daisuke Kihara2,3, Lukasz Kurgan1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
|February 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) interact with many molecules. This study reviews 38 predictors for these binding IDRs, highlighting deep learning advancements and the impact of accessible tools on research use.

Keywords:
CAID, Critical Assessment of Intrinsic DisorderCASP, Critical Assessment of techniques for protein Structure PredictionDL, deep learningDisordered binding regionsIDP, intrinsically disordered proteinIDR, intrinsically disordered regionIntrinsic disorderML, machine learningMoRF, molecular recognition fragmentMolecular recognition featuresNN, neural networkProtein-lipid interactionsProtein-nucleic acids interactionsProtein-protein interactionsSLiM, short linear sequence motifShort linear motifs

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are crucial for molecular interactions, encompassing diverse binding types like molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs) and short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs).
  • Predicting these binding IDRs in protein sequences is an active area of research, with significant progress in recent years.
  • The ability of IDRs to bind proteins, nucleic acids (RNA, DNA), and lipids underscores their functional versatility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey and analyze existing computational tools for predicting binding intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs).
  • To provide a historical perspective on the development of IDR prediction methods.
  • To identify trends and recommend future directions in the field of binding IDR prediction.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of 38 distinct predictors for binding IDRs was conducted.
  • The study analyzed the diverse range of predictive architectures employed, including scoring functions, regular expressions, machine learning (traditional and deep), and meta-models.
  • The availability and accessibility (implementations, webservers) of these prediction tools were assessed.

Main Results:

  • The survey identified 38 predictors targeting interactions with peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA, and lipids.
  • Deep neural network-based architectures represent a recent focus, with increasing coverage for RNA, DNA, and lipid-binding IDRs.
  • Tools with available implementations and webservers demonstrated significantly higher citation and usage rates.

Conclusions:

  • The development of binding IDR predictors has evolved significantly, with deep learning showing great promise.
  • Accessible tools (webservers, code) are critical for widespread adoption and impact in the research community.
  • Future efforts should focus on advanced deep learning architectures, integrated prediction of multiple binding types, and modeling of complex structures.