Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Isolated Left Anterior
Shijie Zhang1, Shanghao Chen2, Kun Yang3
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China. 17853138359@163.com.
Insights
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) shows reduced long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for isolated left anterior descending lesions. No significant differences in survival or short-term outcomes were observed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The optimal revascularization strategy for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) lesions remains debated.
- Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are primary treatment options.
- This meta-analysis compares long- and short-term outcomes of MIDCAB versus PCI for isolated LAD lesions.
Approach:
- Searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases (2002-2022).
- Included 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies.
- Analyzed 1757 patients in the MIDCAB group and 15245 patients in the PCI group.
Key Points:
- No significant difference in long-term survival between MIDCAB and PCI.
- MIDCAB demonstrated a lower rate of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
- PCI was associated with an increased risk of long-term target vessel revascularization (TVR).
- Short-term outcomes including mortality, myocardial infarction, TVR, and MACE were similar.
Conclusions:
- MIDCAB offers reduced long-term TVR and MACE compared to PCI for isolated LAD lesions.
- No significant advantage of MIDCAB over PCI in long-term mortality or short-term results.
- Further large multicenter RCTs are needed to evaluate newer techniques.
Background:
The optimal revascularization strategy for isolated left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery lesion between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This updated meta-analysis aims to compare the long- and short-term outcomes of MIDCAB versus PCI for patients with isolated LAD coronary artery lesions.
Methods:
The Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for retrieving potential publications from 2002 to 2022. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes were long-term target vessel revascularization (TVR), long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and short-term outcomes, including postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), TVR, and MACEs of any cause in-hospital or 30 days after the revascularization.
Results:
Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight observational studies were included in this updated meta-analysis. In total, 1757 patients underwent MIDCAB and 15245 patients underwent PCI. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the rates of long-term survival. MIDCAB had a lower long-term MACE rate compared with PCI. Besides, PCI resulted in an augmented risk of TVR. Postoperative mortality, MI, TVR, and MACEs were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions:
The updated meta-analysis presents the evidence that MIDCAB has a reduced risk of long-term TVR and MACEs, with no benefit in terms of long-term mortality and short-term results, in comparison with PCI. Large multicenter RCTs, including patients treated with newer techniques, are warranted in the future.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
