Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Derivation and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model in patients with acute heart failure
Kayo Misumi1, Yuya Matsue2, Kazutaka Nogi3
1Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan; Department of Critical Care, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Risk stratification is important in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and a simple risk score that accurately predicts mortality is needed. The aim of this study is to develop a user-friendly risk-prediction model using a machine-learning method.
Methods:
A machine-learning-based risk model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was developed by identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality in the derivation cohort (REALITY-AHF), and its performance was externally validated in the validation cohort (NARA-HF) and compared with two pre-existing risk models: the Get With The Guidelines risk score incorporating brain natriuretic peptide and hypochloremia (GWTG-BNP-Cl-RS) and the acute decompensated heart failure national registry risk (ADHERE).
Results:
In-hospital deaths in the derivation and validation cohorts were 76 (5.1 %) and 61 (4.9 %), respectively. The risk score comprised four variables (systolic blood pressure, blood urea nitrogen, serum chloride, and C-reactive protein) and was developed according to the results of the LASSO regression weighting the coefficient for selected variables using a logistic regression model (4 V-RS). Even though 4 V-RS comprised fewer variables, in the validation cohort, it showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than the ADHERE risk model (AUC, 0.783 vs. 0.740; p = 0.059) and a significant improvement in net reclassification (0.359; 95 % CI, 0.10-0.67; p = 0.006). 4 V-RS performed similarly to GWTG-BNP-Cl-RS in terms of discrimination (AUC, 0.783 vs. 0.759; p = 0.426) and net reclassification (0.176; 95 % CI, -0.08-0.43; p = 0.178).
Conclusions:
The 4 V-RS model comprising only four readily available data points at the time of admission performed similarly to the more complex pre-existing risk model in patients with AHF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

