Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Subgroup effects should be examined using both relative and absolute effect measures
Peter Socha1, Sam Harper1, Jennifer A Hutcheon2
1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract:
Treatment effects can be measured on the relative scale (eg, risk ratios, odds ratios) or the absolute scale (eg, risk differences). If the baseline risk of an outcome is different between subgroups, the effect of the treatment will differ between subgroups on at least one scale (relative, absolute, or both). We illustrate this using two examples from the literature where only relative effects were estimated, but conclusions about subgroup differences would likely have changed had absolute effects also been considered. To identify all meaningful subgroup differences, researchers and clinicians should compare effects on the relative and absolute scale.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Group Design
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

