Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Deliberate ignorance-a barrier for information interventions targeting reduced meat consumption?
Philipp Kadel1, Ira E Herwig1, Jutta Mata1
1Health Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
People often ignore information about meat's negative effects, a behavior called deliberate ignorance. This hinders reducing meat consumption, but self-efficacy interventions show promise in overcoming this barrier.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Science
- Environmental Psychology
- Consumer Behavior
Background:
- Meat consumption in Western countries significantly exceeds recommendations despite available negative health and environmental information.
- Deliberate ignorance, the conscious avoidance of information, may explain this discrepancy.
- Understanding deliberate ignorance is crucial for designing effective interventions to modify dietary habits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate deliberate ignorance as a barrier to reducing meat consumption.
- To identify predictors and outcomes of deliberate ignorance.
- To experimentally test interventions aimed at reducing deliberate ignorance.
Main Methods:
- Three studies with 1133 participants examined the impact of ignoring information on meat consumption intentions.
- Deliberate ignorance was quantified by the number of ignored information chunks.
- Interventions included self-affirmation, contemplation, and self-efficacy exercises.
Main Results:
- Higher levels of deliberate ignorance correlated with smaller changes in intention to reduce meat consumption (r = -0.124).
- Cognitive dissonance partially mediated the relationship between ignored information and intention change.
- Self-efficacy interventions significantly reduced deliberate ignorance, unlike self-affirmation or contemplation.
Conclusions:
- Deliberate ignorance presents a significant barrier to information-based interventions aimed at reducing meat consumption.
- Future interventions and research should address and consider deliberate ignorance.
- Self-efficacy exercises offer a promising strategy for mitigating deliberate ignorance and should be further investigated.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Cognitive Dissonance
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...

