Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Beyond guideline knowledge: a theory-based qualitative study of low-value preoperative testing
Yamile Jasaui1, Sameh Mortazhejri2,3, Shawn Dowling4
1Continuing Medical Education, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Guidelines recommend against preoperative tests for low-risk surgery, yet ordering persists. This study used the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to uncover clinician beliefs driving unnecessary electrocardiograms (ECGs) and chest X-rays (CXRs), revealing a need for behavior-focused interventions.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Medical Decision Making
- Behavioral Science in Medicine
Background:
- Major anesthesia and preoperative guidelines advise against routine preoperative tests for low-risk procedures.
- Despite recommendations, low-value preoperative test ordering remains prevalent.
- The theoretical domains framework (TDF) is utilized to explore factors influencing preoperative test ordering.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand the drivers of preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) and chest X-ray (CXR) ordering for low-risk surgeries.
- To identify influencing factors among anesthesiologists, internal medicine specialists, nurses, and surgeons.
- To inform interventions aimed at reducing low-value preoperative testing.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with preoperative clinicians in a Canadian health system.
- Snowball sampling was used for participant recruitment.
- The interview guide was based on the TDF to probe influences on ECG and CXR ordering; content was deductively coded.
Main Results:
- Eight TDF domains were identified as drivers of preoperative test ordering.
- Clinicians expressed distrust in guideline evidence and faced unclear role responsibilities.
- Ease of ordering tests, fear of surgery cancellation, and preventing intraoperative issues influenced ordering decisions.
Conclusions:
- Key factors influencing preoperative test ordering by various specialists were identified.
- Interventions should move beyond knowledge dissemination to address local behavioral drivers.
- Targeted changes at individual, team, and institutional levels are necessary to reduce low-value testing.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Cochran's Q Test
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...