A Study to Compare Ultrasound-guided and Clinically Guided Fluid Management in Children with Septic Shock

Ryan Sohail Kaiser1, Mihir Sarkar1, Sumantra Kumar Raut2

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Insights

Ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation significantly reduced fluid overload in children with septic shock compared to clinical guidance. This approach also decreased fluid administration and resuscitation time, improving patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Background:

  • Septic shock in children necessitates careful fluid resuscitation to avoid complications like fluid overload.
  • Clinical assessment alone may lead to suboptimal fluid management in pediatric septic shock.
  • Evaluating novel resuscitation strategies is crucial for improving outcomes in critically ill children.

Observation:

  • A randomized controlled trial compared ultrasound-guided versus clinically guided fluid boluses in children with septic shock.
  • The study enrolled 56 children aged 1 month to 12 years in a tertiary care hospital.
  • Fluid overload on day 3 was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including fluid balance and resuscitation time.

Findings:

  • Ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation resulted in a significantly lower incidence of fluid overload on day 3 (25% vs. 62%, p=0.012).
  • The ultrasound group had a lower cumulative fluid balance percentage and received significantly less fluid volume per bolus.
  • Resuscitation time was also significantly shorter in the ultrasound-guided group (13.4 vs. 20.5 hours, p=0.002).

Implications:

  • Ultrasound guidance is a superior method for fluid resuscitation in pediatric septic shock, effectively preventing fluid overload.
  • Integrating POCUS into fluid management protocols can optimize resuscitation and reduce associated complications.
  • This evidence supports the broader adoption of ultrasound-guided fluid therapy in pediatric intensive care units.
Abstract