Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Modalities for Complex Aortic Aneurysms: A Network Meta-Analysis of
Yang Zhou1, Junwei Wang1, Hao He1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Vascular Disease Institute of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Background:
To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing multiple treatments for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs).
Methods:
Medical databases were searched on November 11, 2022. Twenty-five studies (5,149 patients) and four treatments (open surgery [OS], chimney/snorkel endovascular aneurysm repair [CEVAR], fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair [FEVAR], and branched endovascular aneurysm repair) were selected. Outcomes were branch vessel patency, mortality, and reintervention at short- and long-term followup, and perioperative complications.
Results:
Regarding branch vessel patency, OS was the most effective treatment and had higher 24-month branch vessel patency rates than CEVAR (odds ratio [OR], 10.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-55.79). FEVAR (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-1.00) and OS (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93) were better than CEVAR regarding 30-day mortality and 24-month mortality, respectively. Regarding 24-month reintervention, OS was better than CEVAR (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.15-8.18) and FEVAR (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.08-5.73). Regarding perioperative complications, FEVAR had lower acute renal failure rates than OS (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.66) and CEVAR (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92) and lower myocardial infarction rates than OS (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.97) and was the most effective treatment in preventing acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, and stroke, while OS was the most effective treatment in preventing spinal cord ischemia.
Conclusions:
OS might have advantages regarding branch vessel patency, 24-month mortality, and reintervention and is similar to FEVAR regarding 30-day mortality. Regarding perioperative complications, FEVAR might confer advantages in preventing acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, and stroke, and OS in preventing spinal cord ischemia.
Insights
Open surgery (OS) shows superior outcomes for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs) in branch vessel patency, mortality, and reintervention. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) excels in preventing perioperative complications like renal failure and myocardial infarction.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs) present significant treatment challenges.
- Evaluating the comparative effectiveness of different repair strategies is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing open surgery (OS), chimney/snorkel endovascular aneurysm repair (CEVAR), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for CAAs.
- To assess treatment efficacy regarding branch vessel patency, mortality, reintervention, and perioperative complications.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of medical databases was performed on November 11, 2022.
- Twenty-five studies involving 5,149 patients were included, comparing OS, CEVAR, FEVAR, and branched endovascular aneurysm repair.
- Outcomes analyzed included short- and long-term branch vessel patency, mortality, reintervention rates, and perioperative complications.
Main Results:
- Open surgery demonstrated superior 24-month branch vessel patency compared to CEVAR.
- FEVAR and OS showed lower 30-day and 24-month mortality, respectively, compared to CEVAR.
- OS was associated with better 24-month reintervention rates than CEVAR and FEVAR.
- FEVAR exhibited lower rates of acute renal failure and myocardial infarction than OS and CEVAR.
- FEVAR was most effective in preventing acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, and stroke; OS was most effective for spinal cord ischemia.
Conclusions:
- Open surgery may offer advantages in branch vessel patency, 24-month mortality, and reintervention for CAAs.
- FEVAR demonstrates significant benefits in reducing perioperative complications, including acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, and stroke.
- Both OS and FEVAR show comparable 30-day mortality rates.
- Open surgery remains superior in preventing spinal cord ischemia.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

